Originally posted by bundy7
View Post
controversial??? i've heard a lot of comments about that fight, but CONTROVERSIAL wasn't one. that fight was clearly ALL hopkins. and ppl forget, winky and hopkins are both COUNTERPUNCHERS, it was destined to be a boring fight. what the CASUAL boxing fan didn't notice was hopkins' ability to bait wright and land some very clean stuff as the fight wore on. and that's saying alot considering the fact that many ppl say winky has the best defense in the game! joe will make the fight look interesting, b/c he will throw a lot of punches, but u must look at where the punches land. sum1 said, even if hopkins were to hold joe to 500 punches thrown for the fight, joe would still end up throwing 2 or 300 more than hopkins. i for one, actually agree.
but in the end, hopkins will end up LANDING as many shots as joe, if not more, and hopkins' punches will be cleaner, heavier, and indeed do more damage. its very important while watching this fight, ppl dont mistake joes habit of throwing a lot of shots for actually landing what he is throwing. that's the key in this fight.
reminds me of the taylor-hopkins fights in a sense. jt was throwing a lot, but many of the rounds they were giving taylor, it was hopkins landing the harder shots, it was jt's activity that gave him many rounds, and to educated fight fans, as well as judges, this should've been and should be obvious. hopkins clearly won the first fight, and the second fight jt was better than the first fight, so if u wanna say DRAW im okay with that. but there is no way in hell, taylor WON either fight. something else that ppl dont catch- jt is not as good as calzaghe, but he did have a jab that he used a lot, and used to set up other ****. calzaghe doesn't jab at all, and that's something else that will prove big in this fight, and nobody mentions it.
Comment