(Maybe I missed it, but) Why does Hatton think he deserves a rematch with Floyd?

[mitch12]

i dont get you people i mean somoene like hopkins uses dirty tactics like head butting etc and you dont mind it yet hatton wrestles abit and its so bad talk about bias towards your own.

[-EX-]

I picked the second option but I don't think the fight will happen.

[DiegoFuego]

The fight was NOWHERE NEAR close. The Floyd/Oscar fight was at least a close match, and I don't really have a problem with a close fight or split decision resulting in a rematch. Hatton was a plodding punching bag that was not allowed to fight illegally, and Floyd showed exactly what happens to Hatton when Hatton is not allowed to hold and hit. So I ask, why the **** does Hatton think he deserves a rematch with Floyd?

I am so proud of you. This is a flawless post.

[Zarco]

Hatton does not really deserve a rematch with Floyd, i mean the first fight was good but not that good, it seems Floyd is getting ready to leave boxing so he should fight other exciting fighters. Hattons style isnt really attractive.

[feed-the-goat]

The best chance of a rematch is if Floyd gets beat first
Floyds never coming over here, if he has not got the balls to fight cotto then what makes you feel he has got what it takes to step out of his comfort zone and fight in another country

[MetalVomit]

The best chance of a rematch is if Floyd gets beat first
Floyds never coming over here, if he has not got the balls to fight cotto then what makes you feel he has got what it takes to step out of his comfort zone and fight in another country

Fighting Hatton in England may make more money than a Cotto fight, but I think even Floyd knows a rematch with Hatton will not be purchased via ppv by many outside of delusional Hatton fans.

[supermandathoe]

A combination of the last two.

[MetalVomit]

A combination of the last two.

Yeah, I was thinking that I should have made that an option.

[squealpiggy]

Getting in close, holding one of your opponents arms and teeing off with your free arm is called "holding and hitting", and is not supposed to be allowed in a boxing ring. In an mma ring, I think it's legal, but not in boxing.

That wouldn't be so bad apart from Cortez was allowing Floyd to hold and hit. He just wasn't letting Hatton do the same. The refereeing was unfair and that's the beef.

Hatton thinks he can beat Mayweather, that's why he wants the fight. Mayweather has the opportunity for a very lucrative fight against Hatton in an outdoor stadium in front of a hundred thousand fans, that's why he'll grant the fight.

[supermandathoe]

That wouldn't be so bad apart from Cortez was allowing Floyd to hold and hit. He just wasn't letting Hatton do the same. The refereeing was unfair and that's the beef.

Hatton thinks he can beat Mayweather, that's why he wants the fight. Mayweather has the opportunity for a very lucrative fight against Hatton in an outdoor stadium in front of a hundred thousand fans, that's why he'll grant the fight.

The question is do YOU think the fight is warranted. I can give VERY apt and FACTUAL reasoning for why the Floyd/DLH rematch was made but even I can admit I DON'T AGREE WITH IT. Do you agree with Mayweather/Hatton 2?