(Maybe I missed it, but) Why does Hatton think he deserves a rematch with Floyd?

[MetalVomit]

yeah hatton lost and badly lost, but you cant deney that he wasnt aloowed to fight his fight wich you seem to call ileagal,
,

Getting in close, holding one of your opponents arms and teeing off with your free arm is called "holding and hitting", and is not supposed to be allowed in a boxing ring. In an mma ring, I think it's legal, but not in boxing.

There is no denying that Hatton does this every chance he get. Against Jose Luis Castillo, I believe he started doing it less than 20 seconds into the first round.

[mr tricky]

/

He thinks Joe Cortez didn't let him fight "his fight", which of course means mauling, wrestling, and grabbing i.e. nothing related to boxing.

hattons boxing is not text book boxing yet its just as effective ,

who ses he has to jab and right hand and move about wen he can knockout 43 peole by going inside, you may call it mauling but then if the otyher guy is a good "boxer" he wouldnt get himself itto the mauling,

even floyd couldnt keep away from hatton instead he shocked everyone by doinging mauling and roughing up off his own,

[mr tricky]

/

Getting in close, holding one of your opponents arms and teeing off with your free arm is called "holding and hitting", and is not supposed to be allowed in a boxing ring. In an mma ring, I think it's legal, but not in boxing.

then why dont people complain, and why dont the refs try to stop him, beside floyd did and has done the egsct same thing in the past, hatton dosnt realy hold and hit? if he diod it would be stoped, floyd did the perfect egsample of holding and hitting in their fight,

Hattons an inside fighter who gets in his oponents face and reoughs them up if they wanted to they would do it back or try and get away

[Killa Cam]

he wasnt able to get his style goin wit tha ref on his nuts for erry little thing he did that fight, im a mayweather fan over a hatton fan, but tha ***** never let ricky do ricky if uknowwhatimsayin, jus let em fight

[WHB3]

Anybody who thinks Hatton deserves a rematch is a delusional fanboy. There's no other way to put it. You're out of your ****ing mind if you believe he should get a rematch.

[Knicksman20]

Mayweather's win was so decisive there's no need for a rematch.

[MetalVomit]

then why dont people complain, and why dont the refs try to stop him, beside floyd did and has done the egsct same thing in the past, hatton dosnt realy hold and hit? if he diod it would be stoped, floyd did the perfect egsample of holding and hitting in their fight,

Hattons an inside fighter who gets in his oponents face and reoughs them up if they wanted to they would do it back or try and get away

There's no point in arguing the obvious. If you watch Hatton, you know he holds and hits. I'm not being biased against him or making **** up, it's just true. He gets in close, uses his right arm, usually, to hold his opponent's left arm so he cannot move, and swing away with his left. It's illegal, and your guess is as good as mine as far as why no one stops him. When he started gaining worldwide attention, I was eager to see him fight. After his extremely dirty performance against Kostya Tszyu, I was shocked. Both guys had a little dirty fighting in that fight, but Hatton DEPENDS on being allowed to fight dirty. We all saw what happens when Hatton is not allowed to fight dirty, and yes, Floyd was using his elbows way too much and pushing off, he's not exempt from criticism.

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=138235&highlight=hatton+allowed

[Pugilistic™]

it must be for another big payday and revenge.

[johnm is...]

it must be for another big payday and revenge.

Well, at least he'll get one of 'em.

[VERSION1 (V1)]

hatton knows all about cream
Cash
Rules
Everything
Around
Me