i go to school to read essays not boxing scene-FACT!
FACTS ONLY THREAD(NO FACTS NO CHAT) If u only have Arugments w/o FACTs, DONT ENTER..!
Collapse
-
Your seeming obsession with facts and numbers is not always the correct way to look at things as not everything can be judged by facts and numbers and can actually present quite a twisted point of view. Numbers especially can lead to a largely misguided perspective and therefore not everything should be looked at in terms of facts and numbers.
To look at everything or judge events only in this manner means you are missing out on a very large part of what is going on. Facts and numbers are static and are just a human concept. Life has more to it than that and many things go well beyond looking at things as just facts and numbers.
In fact, I know that you are largely contradicting yourself by stating that you only look at things from a facts and numbers point of view. If you do judge things in this way then you are quite deluded and are in a state of denial.
You being a huge Mayweather fan, and seemingly only a Mayweather fan really, you seem to be blind to the facts and numbers that were the Mayweather vs Castillo fight.
Facts and numbers: Castillo threw 506 punches and landed 203 (40%). Mayweather, 448, 147 (35%).
More facts and numbers: Castillo threw 377 power punches and landed 173 (46%). Mayweather 151, landed 66 (44%).
Mayweather won this fight and yet the facts and numbers most certainly show that he did absolutely nothing of the sort.
These are the facts and numbers my man and they don't always add up. History will show Mayweather as having beaten Castillo and yet the facts and numbers show a very different story.
Time to get some perspective.
Last edited by BennyST; 04-11-2008, 06:55 AM.Comment
-
Here's are some FACTS for you... Horus... backs all his stuff with press clippings...
Fact... The press has been known to lie,misinform and misquote
Fact..If someone else uses press clippings.. Horus suddenly believes that fact about the press being less than honest..
Fact.. that is known as Hypocrisy
That is all..Comment
-
Gatti did not fight Oscar in the BEGINNING of Oscars prime. They fought in 2001, Oscar prime peaked against Tinidad in 1999, FACT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Do you even read what people post. I already anwered your question about Gatti and the PPV. gatti fought Oscar in 2001, a yr before the famous gatti vss Ward fights. Gatti after those fights became mainstream. Floyd fought Gatti in 2005. Gatti was mainstream , in the same way tyson and Oscar were mainstream. He was a known fighter, even by those who knew nothing about boxing.
Anyone can use numbers and twist them to fit their agenda.
Bottom line is this: Osacr fought gatti 4yrs before floyd. Gatti became mainstream after the Ward fights. Gatti was the blood and guts warrior and connected with Joe Blow, so they tuned ib to watch the fight. It was Gatti who was the attraction, floyd was the anti hero. FACT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Comment
-
Whoa, do you even know what you wrote. You said Arum found the perfect opponent to Jumpstart Floyd's career. Now why would he do that, would it be because gatti had mainstream appeal and could sell the fight?
Now, tell me Gatti wasn't the attraction, I want to see you try now.
The focus was gatti fighting Floyd- as written by HORUSComment
-
Facts and numbers don't always add up to what is correct or what actually happens in real life. Life cannot always be judged in terms of straight facts or numbers. History is biased and can be created or changed depending on what those in power want the history books to say. History is easily changed and does not always reflect accurately what happened in history.
Your seeming obsession with facts and numbers is not always the correct way to look at things as not everything can be judged by facts and numbers and can actually present quite a twisted point of view. Numbers especially can lead to a largely misguided perspective and therefore not everything should be looked at in terms of facts and numbers.
To look at everything or judge events only in this manner means you are missing out on a very large part of what is going on. Facts and numbers are static and are just a human concept. Life has more to it than that and many things go well beyond looking at things as just facts and numbers.
In fact, I know that you are largely contradicting yourself by stating that you only look at things from a facts and numbers point of view. If you do judge things in this way then you are quite deluded and are in a state of denial.
You being a huge Mayweather fan, and seemingly only a Mayweather fan really, you seem to be blind to the facts and numbers that were the Mayweather vs Castillo fight.
Facts and numbers: Castillo threw 506 punches and landed 203 (40%). Mayweather, 448, 147 (35%).
More facts and numbers: Castillo threw 377 power punches and landed 173 (46%). Mayweather 151, landed 66 (44%).
Mayweather won this fight and yet the facts and numbers most certainly show that he did absolutely nothing of the sort.
These are the facts and numbers my man and they don't always add up. History will show Mayweather as having beaten Castillo and yet the facts and numbers show a very different story.
Time to get some perspective.
Talk about a KO PUNCH SON!
Comment
-
why in the ****'s name would you bump this bull****. honestly this is one of the most ******ed threads on boxing scene. what you trying to prove to him, everyone knows that gatti was the attraction in his fight with floyd, everyone knows except Horus. he gets these ****ing digits and tries to make a fun and debatable sport discussion into some ****ing science project. nothing will change his mind because he believes too much into his own bull****.
honeslty i get a headache just looking at all the numbers this guy is posting. he's spraying cum all over floyd's name. horus is probably one of floyd's secret accountants. **** it might even be that fat ass leonard ellerby
wrap up this bull**** alreadyComment
-
U wanna talk about delusional? Horus' tried to REDEFINE the word "fan" as in "im a boxing fan" so that it suits his argument about Floyd having more fans than Cotto. He said that Webster's definition of "fan" isnt neccesarily the right definition. His claim was that if you pay for a ppv that Floyd is involved in, that automitically makes u a fan of his, regardless if you're going for his opponent.
Check out this thread! LOL
Comment
-
U wanna talk about delusional? Horus' tried to REDEFINE the word "fan" as in "im a boxing fan" so that it suits his argument about Floyd having more fans than Cotto. He said that Webster's definition of "fan" isnt neccesarily the right definition. His claim was that if you pay for a ppv that Floyd is involved in, that automitically makes u a fan of his, regardless if you're going for his opponent.
Check out this thread! LOL
http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=174247Comment
Comment