Okay, here is what I am asking:
Roberto Duran is generally viewed as the best lightweight. How much better is he than the #2 of all-time at that weight? Does he have a larger margin of greatness than, say, Marvin Hagler had over the #2 ATG at middleweight? I am basically asking who is the most dominant fighter at their weight compared to other most dominant fighters at their weight.
Was Ricardo Lopez a greater minimumweight than Evander Holyfield was at cruiserweight?
Does Roberto Duran at lightweight stand a chance against Wilfredo Gomez at 122?
Robinson at 147 or Michael Spinks at 175?
Who do you all think takes the crown?
Roberto Duran is generally viewed as the best lightweight. How much better is he than the #2 of all-time at that weight? Does he have a larger margin of greatness than, say, Marvin Hagler had over the #2 ATG at middleweight? I am basically asking who is the most dominant fighter at their weight compared to other most dominant fighters at their weight.
Was Ricardo Lopez a greater minimumweight than Evander Holyfield was at cruiserweight?
Does Roberto Duran at lightweight stand a chance against Wilfredo Gomez at 122?
Robinson at 147 or Michael Spinks at 175?
Who do you all think takes the crown?
Comment