Originally posted by raysan
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Pacquiao’s Side Rejected a Rematch Clause
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by whirlwind View PostMany peoples eyes? Whos eyes? Mexicans or Filipinos eyes? How about stating the facts like JMM got lucky because the 3 kd rules were not in effect and the screwed judge scoring error? You should happy JMM got the draw in the first fight. How about the facts in 2nd fight. The fight was close in can go either way but because of the 2 knockdown Pac clearly won the fight. All these Pac haters i dont know when they can accept the facts that Pac decked JMM 5 times!
Comment
-
Originally posted by raabd View PostMarquez said he's willing to fight pac at 135 during the post fight press conference. Imo jmm really doesn't have anything to prove as far as his legacy goes. I think he'll fight a couple of fights at 130 before moving up for the rematch. Even pac wouldn't fight joan guzman.
Yes he does. His resume is poor and falls short to even be considered great/legend. He fought consecutive bums after the draw with Pacman. Salido, Polo, John, Terdsak, Jaca then an old Barrera. He wouldn't even have fought Barrera had Pacquiao didn't sign two contracts.
Comment
-
Originally posted by raysan View Postwhos talking about mexicans or filipinos? Im talking about the general public and sports personalites, consisting of boxing writers and analysts. Both close fights but to say only mexicans are saying JMM is completely wrong.
Comment
-
All I can say is BOB ARUM is a legend in this sport.. He's freaking smart and knows how to handle the business properly.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP View PostGOLDEN Boy Promotions chief executive Richard Schaefer said the handlers of Manny Pacquiao did not want to give Juan Manuel Marquez a rematch clause in the fight contract for their showdown at the Mandalay Bay Resort Hotel and Casino in Las Vegas. [details]
Comment
-
Originally posted by muppetman View Postof course cause they knew that if pac won ....it would be by the hairs on his chiny chin chin........pac got an early christmas present he knows it freddie knows so does bob arum .....its cool though marquez in my eyez and millions of others know marquez is still a better fighter.......he better stay as far away from marquez for another for years if he dosent want a loss!!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by BennyST View PostProbably because they knew if anyone was going to get a dodgy decision it was going to be Pacquiao and that they would prefer not to have to rematch him again. Rrrrrr....It's very unfortunate especially as Marquez was the champ and Pac the challenger that everything goes Pacs way and he gets everything he wanted while the actual champ is the one making all the concessions and getting the dodgy deal and dodgy decision. The concessions that Marquez did have to make really were very unfair and it stinks that he won't even get a rematch after what's happened. After all, Pac did get the rematch clause in the first fight...and against Morales. Why not rightfully give Marquez one?
A rematch is most definitely in order! It's really the only major fight that makes any sense for Pacquiao. The second fight was called 'Unfinished Business" and I think it's even more unfinished now than it ever was.
Theoretically it would be Pac who is up yet in my, and many others, estimation it is Marquez who is the better fighter so far and who should be up at this stage. Hopefully there will be a rematch to settle it once and for all.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MakeDamnSure View PostNo need dude.. Marquez got his Ass beaten twice already if not for the judges mistake.. The 2nd fight could have gone either way or a draw.. A win is a Win and Lose is a Lose.. Too bad Marquez is the loser.. hahahaha
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chups View PostYes he does. His resume is poor and falls short to even be considered great/legend. He fought consecutive bums after the draw with Pacman. Salido, Polo, John, Terdsak, Jaca then an old Barrera. He wouldn't even have fought Barrera had Pacquiao didn't sign two contracts.
Comment
Comment