Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pacquiao’s Side Rejected a Rematch Clause

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by raysan View Post
    well even with that speed hes lost twice to JMM in many peoples eyes.
    Many peoples eyes? Whos eyes? Mexicans or Filipinos eyes? How about stating the facts like JMM got lucky because the 3 kd rules were not in effect and the screwed judge scoring error? You should happy JMM got the draw in the first fight. How about the facts in 2nd fight. The fight was close in can go either way but because of the 2 knockdown Pac clearly won the fight. All these Pac haters i dont know when they can accept the facts that Pac decked JMM 5 times!

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by whirlwind View Post
      Many peoples eyes? Whos eyes? Mexicans or Filipinos eyes? How about stating the facts like JMM got lucky because the 3 kd rules were not in effect and the screwed judge scoring error? You should happy JMM got the draw in the first fight. How about the facts in 2nd fight. The fight was close in can go either way but because of the 2 knockdown Pac clearly won the fight. All these Pac haters i dont know when they can accept the facts that Pac decked JMM 5 times!
      whos talking about mexicans or filipinos? Im talking about the general public and sports personalites, consisting of boxing writers and analysts. Both close fights but to say only mexicans are saying JMM is completely wrong.

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by raabd View Post
        Marquez said he's willing to fight pac at 135 during the post fight press conference. Imo jmm really doesn't have anything to prove as far as his legacy goes. I think he'll fight a couple of fights at 130 before moving up for the rematch. Even pac wouldn't fight joan guzman.

        Yes he does. His resume is poor and falls short to even be considered great/legend. He fought consecutive bums after the draw with Pacman. Salido, Polo, John, Terdsak, Jaca then an old Barrera. He wouldn't even have fought Barrera had Pacquiao didn't sign two contracts.

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by raysan View Post
          whos talking about mexicans or filipinos? Im talking about the general public and sports personalites, consisting of boxing writers and analysts. Both close fights but to say only mexicans are saying JMM is completely wrong.
          What I meant is we cannot rely on peoples eyes because sometimes they only can see what they want to see, like being bias. Thats why we need to state the facts so nobody can deny it.

          Comment


          • #25
            All I can say is BOB ARUM is a legend in this sport.. He's freaking smart and knows how to handle the business properly.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP View Post
              GOLDEN Boy Promotions chief executive Richard Schaefer said the handlers of Manny Pacquiao did not want to give Juan Manuel Marquez a rematch clause in the fight contract for their showdown at the Mandalay Bay Resort Hotel and Casino in Las Vegas. [details]
              of course cause they knew that if pac won ....it would be by the hairs on his chiny chin chin........pac got an early christmas present he knows it freddie knows so does bob arum .....its cool though marquez in my eyez and millions of others know marquez is still a better fighter.......he better stay as far away from marquez for another for years if he dosent want a loss!!!

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by muppetman View Post
                of course cause they knew that if pac won ....it would be by the hairs on his chiny chin chin........pac got an early christmas present he knows it freddie knows so does bob arum .....its cool though marquez in my eyez and millions of others know marquez is still a better fighter.......he better stay as far away from marquez for another for years if he dosent want a loss!!!
                No need dude.. Marquez got his Ass beaten twice already if not for the judges mistake.. The 2nd fight could have gone either way or a draw.. A win is a Win and Lose is a Lose.. Too bad Marquez is the loser.. hahahaha

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by BennyST View Post
                  Probably because they knew if anyone was going to get a dodgy decision it was going to be Pacquiao and that they would prefer not to have to rematch him again. Rrrrrr....It's very unfortunate especially as Marquez was the champ and Pac the challenger that everything goes Pacs way and he gets everything he wanted while the actual champ is the one making all the concessions and getting the dodgy deal and dodgy decision. The concessions that Marquez did have to make really were very unfair and it stinks that he won't even get a rematch after what's happened. After all, Pac did get the rematch clause in the first fight...and against Morales. Why not rightfully give Marquez one?

                  A rematch is most definitely in order! It's really the only major fight that makes any sense for Pacquiao. The second fight was called 'Unfinished Business" and I think it's even more unfinished now than it ever was.

                  Theoretically it would be Pac who is up yet in my, and many others, estimation it is Marquez who is the better fighter so far and who should be up at this stage. Hopefully there will be a rematch to settle it once and for all.
                  great post!!

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by MakeDamnSure View Post
                    No need dude.. Marquez got his Ass beaten twice already if not for the judges mistake.. The 2nd fight could have gone either way or a draw.. A win is a Win and Lose is a Lose.. Too bad Marquez is the loser.. hahahaha
                    its cool cause as pac gets older and gets stoped by young hungry mexican then he will be nothing anymore and when it happens dont say its cause hes old and battle worn.....and pac can only dream about being as great as marquez is at 34 even when marquez is 39 he will still be more superior.......besides i think we finally found our pinoy executioner and he goes by the name....JUAN MANUEL MARQUEZ......SO ENJOY PAC WHILE YOU CAN CUZ ONCE HES GONE ALL YOU PINOY WILL JUST GET KNOCKED POUT LIKE YALL ALWAYS DO BY NON OTHER THAN MEXICANS.....WE DO HAVE SO MANY CHAMPS DONT WE....HAHWAHBWHWHBAWHBAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by Chups View Post
                      Yes he does. His resume is poor and falls short to even be considered great/legend. He fought consecutive bums after the draw with Pacman. Salido, Polo, John, Terdsak, Jaca then an old Barrera. He wouldn't even have fought Barrera had Pacquiao didn't sign two contracts.
                      LOL....AN OLD BARRERA.......WHOS THE OLDER MARQUEZ OR BARRERA YOU ******.......LOL WHAT A PAC FANGIRL!!!!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP