Anyone can "dominate" if you give them nothing but ****ty opponents.
um....NO
William Joppy bounced back after the Tito fight with a win over Howard Eastman a legit top 5 guy at 160 so obviously he wasn't that washed up was he?
do you have any idea what it takes to rule your division for 10 freaking years and make 19 defenses and unify??
Just like guys like Joe Loius and Mike Tyson when they were on top they didn't fight in a deep era, but if you fight every toip guy it's not who you beats its how you beat them and Hopkins has been flat out dominate.
William Joppy bounced back after the Tito fight with a win over Howard Eastman a legit top 5 guy at 160 so obviously he wasn't that washed up was he?
do you have any idea what it takes to rule your division for 10 freaking years and make 19 defenses and unify??
Just like guys like Joe Loius and Mike Tyson when they were on top they didn't fight in a deep era, but if you fight every toip guy it's not who you beats its how you beat them and Hopkins has been flat out dominate.
You cant argue with winning
10 years and 19 defenses
18 you mean, 19 was a joke.
By using your Joppy sentence, you must also think that because MAB beat Ayala, he isn't washed up or wasn't ****ed up from Morales and Pac.
Hopkins is a guy who will never be on any of my top lists.
Maybe if he quits being a coward and moves up to light-heavy and if he's able to "dominate" there, then I may give him a little respect.
But for the most part I don't like the guy.
I am serious.
I don't care for Hopkins, I never have.
Even with all the hype, bull**** ending, and people in line to suck his ****, I'm still not a fan.
The guy is very lucky, I'll give him that.
Comment