Boxing emphasised too much on a loss

[2501]

You also suck in general, "sooky sooky 5 dorra"

[SkillspayBills]

It keeps the best from fighting the best since they won't take the risk if they can lose.

[paul750]

I think it motivates fighters to be at their best at all times because they know they may only get one shot, which i enjoy. It also shows the real skill in boxing and thats why boxing has elite fighters, where as in MMA for the most part its a crap shoot. I think no dominant stars will end up hurting MMA in the long run.

But how can they be at their best if they're fighting club fighters more often than real competition? I think boxing should really take a leaf out of MMA's book.

[moin126]

going up to 154 to fight a very experienced olympic gold medalist isnt a big risk.

[2501]

going up to 154 to fight a very experienced olympic gold medalist isnt a big risk.

who are you talking about?

[moin126]

who are you talking about?

you know who the **** i am talking about kid. you love my **** 250, you ve been on my **** nukka.

[2501]

you know who the **** i am talking about kid. you love my **** 250, you ve been on my **** nukka.

who is you talkin about son?

[-----------]

its ridiculous how some fighters get pushed aside after losing a fight.

Thats what makes a fight sooo exciting.


Winner moves on.


Loser goes home.


Sorry, will NEVER use a Contender quote again!!!!!!

[TheGreatA]

http://www.boxrec.com/list_bouts.php...9437&cat=boxer
Hall of famer Fritzie Zivic

http://www.boxrec.com/list_bouts.php...7361&cat=boxer
Glen Johnson

[Jim Jeffries]

going up to 154 to fight a very experienced olympic gold medalist isnt a big risk.

When that fighter had lost 3 (arguably 4) of his last five fights, and was about 9 years from their peak at #1 p4p, it's not a huge risk compared to by far the biggest payday that person is recieving.