How would wlad do against the Bad Ass Fighters

[duffgun]

He would brutalize guys that would come at him or stand in one place.

yeah ok then just like how he brutalized sultan who although a good fighter can not be compared to a tyson liston foreman or ike, you honestly no this but just post this crap anyway.

[duffgun]

Uhmm, no.

You seem to have some sort of agenda against Wlad.

eh yes.........

[duffgun]

Uhmm, no.

You seem to have some sort of agenda against Wlad.

you no tyson had good head movement in his prime so why say no?

[BrooklynBomber]

yeah ok then just like how he brutalized sultan who although a good fighter can not be compared to a tyson liston foreman or ike, you honestly no this but just post this crap anyway.

Um, no he did not brutalize Sultan, but he made him look like an amateur fighter in a sparring session.

And besides, Sultan's style is nothing like Foreman's or Tyson's. In a sense he is a very uncomfortable fighter with very good movement that can confuse a lot of people.

[BrooklynBomber]

you no tyson had good head movement in his prime so why say no?

Because Tyson would go straight at Wlad and because Tyson was only 5.10, which would pretty much mean that he would be dwarfed.

[duffgun]

Um, no he did not brutalize Sultan, but he made him look like an amateur fighter in a sparring session.

And besides, Sultan's style is nothing like Foreman's or Tyson's. In a sense he is a very uncomfortable fighter with very good movement that can confuse a lot of people.

i know he did have good head movement but how can you say he would brutalize fighters who have proven a lot more than sultan and have a style that would give wlad a lot of trouble, your jst denying it because of my hating style to the thread

[BrooklynBomber]

i know he did have good head movement but how can you say he would brutalize fighters who have proven a lot more than sultan and have a style that would give wlad a lot of trouble, your jst denying it because of my hating style to the thread

Sultan proved one thing though, he has got that type of movement that would give problems to guys that would decide to follow him.

He is very slick on the outside and his main weapon is that he can cut the distance and the intent very quckly. Which is very confusing for his opponents.


One second he is being slick on the outside and the next he is attacking on the inside.

[duffgun]

Because Tyson would go straight at Wlad and because Tyson was only 5.10, which would pretty much mean that he would be dwarfed.

so what tyson beat tall guys and in his prime didnt come straight forward, mentaly wlad would be in big trouble if your not willing to open up against sultan he would frezze against these guys, i agree that wlad might even have the skills to beat them but he just doesnt have the mental side of the game to beat these guys.
i have been reading the dempsey auto bio and its amazing how many of the smaller guys were knocking out these big 6ft4-6ft6 guys.

[The Hammer]

i know he did have good head movement but how can you say he would brutalize fighters who have proven a lot more than sultan and have a style that would give wlad a lot of trouble, your jst denying it because of my hating style to the thread.

Why do you hate East European fighters, Duffgun? I remember you once posted that you hate the "communist conks", but they haven't been communist since you and I were babies.

[duffgun]

Why do you hate East European fighters, Duffgun? I remember you once posted that you hate the "communist conks", but they haven't been communist since you and I were babies.

they are secretly communist i don't trust any of them.