Most ridiculous statements you have seen defended on this forum

[Jim Jeffries]

It also wouldn't have been stripped for ****** things like... not facing Robert Allen for a third time like Bernard Hopkins had to to keep his IBF strap.

I'm sure after a certain amount of time, they vacate it because of retirement or something.

Oh no doubt the ABC belts take it to the other extreme. But there should be something at least.

[Addison]

Cotto can beat Margarito trying to outBox him.

[tyson]

What does it mean to outbox?

[Fox McCloud]

Cotto can beat Margarito trying to outBox him.

You don't think that making himself a moving target that Margarito couldn't just automatically trade with even has a remote possibility of winning the fight for Cotto?

[ElGranLuchador]

mayweather would ko hearns

[tyson]

You don't think that making himself a moving target that Margarito couldn't just automatically trade with even has a remote possibility of winning the fight for Cotto?

Too advanced. Break it down.

[ßringer]

One of the dumbest I've ever seen defended (and it's stated around here constantly) is that Felix Trinidad was "blown up" fighting Hopkins.

It has to be right up there with one of the dumbest ones ever considering Trinidad did a demolition job on a pretty damn good natural Middleweight William Joppy (32-1 when they fought) whom Hopkins couldn't even knockout.

[Fox McCloud]

"Antonio Tarver is a bum who got lucky against Roy Jones, and can't beat anyone good."

[Nacho_Analstain]

Read my sig, Thats the dumbest comment ever ...

[Addison]

What does it mean to outbox?

That's a damn good question. One I would like to have answered by those who have suggested it as a gameplan for Cotto over Margarito.

You don't think that making himself a moving target that Margarito couldn't just automatically trade with even has a remote possibility of winning the fight for Cotto?

Not when you're incredibly easy to hit dancing around on the outside. No.