What a ****ing robbery!!!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • P4PKING_2008
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Aug 2007
    • 4359
    • 639
    • 323
    • 6,304

    #111
    Originally posted by kayjay
    It is a bit funny that Black Jesus was the only black poster to admit Pavlik won. I'm not saying everyone who thought Taylor won was affected by this, but the evidence that most blacks don't think straight when it comes to seeing a black athlete beaten by a white one is absolutely overwhelming and undeniable. This happens every time. Now some whites may be the same, but a much much lesser percentage. With blacks it's about 98% who are unable to see past the skin.

    Honestly this was not a difficult fight to score. Pavlik won by a lot.
    How did you score it? It shouldn't be anywhere near how the judges scored it.

    Comment

    • Silencers
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • May 2006
      • 21957
      • 505
      • 235
      • 32,983

      #112
      Originally posted by p4pking_2007
      Didn't what?
      Taylor didn't get robbed.

      Comment

      • kayjay
        A ***** and I'm happy
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jan 2006
        • 13652
        • 1,813
        • 5,770
        • 30,799

        #113
        Originally posted by p4pking_2007
        How did you score it? It shouldn't be anywhere near how the judges scored it.
        Man I really wish race weren't an issue, and with most whites it is not. But the polls speak for themselves. It's a blight on black people, I'm not going to refrain from saying it, because it is in fact true.

        I had no dog in the fight, kind of wanted Taylor to win. But Pavlik easily won eight rounds. You could reasonably give him nine.
        Last edited by kayjay; 02-18-2008, 11:42 AM.

        Comment

        • Jim Jeffries
          rugged individualist
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Oct 2007
          • 20740
          • 1,376
          • 2,868
          • 54,838

          #114
          Originally posted by Derranged
          I've said this a couple of times already, but **** it- I scored it 115-113 for Taylor, but it was very very close, and it could've went either way. There were some very close rounds.
          Finally, a sensible Taylor fan. I believe the judge that scored it 117-111 was a bit off, but there were a lot of close rounds that could have went either way depending on what you like. The problems arise when you keep giving every close round to the same fighter.

          Comment

          • Jim Jeffries
            rugged individualist
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2007
            • 20740
            • 1,376
            • 2,868
            • 54,838

            #115
            Originally posted by p4pking_2007
            How did you score it? It shouldn't be anywhere near how the judges scored it.
            What was wrong with the judge that scored it 115-113? No matter how you scored it that should seem reasonable.

            Comment

            • P4PKING_2008
              Banned
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Aug 2007
              • 4359
              • 639
              • 323
              • 6,304

              #116
              Originally posted by gavinz1970
              What was wrong with the judge that scored it 115-113? No matter how you scored it that should seem reasonable.
              The judge that gave like 8 rounds to pavlik. That is way off. I had Taylor by three rounds and I have watched it twice.

              Comment

              • Burning Desire
                Banned
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Apr 2007
                • 1270
                • 52
                • 25
                • 1,490

                #117
                Originally posted by p4pking_2007
                Taylor won that fight by three rounds. Clearly I downloaded a setanta broadcast of it and it was so unbelievably biased it was untrue. How can a jab, jab, right hand. Beat a better defensively and better offensively fighter? The judge who scored it by about 8 rounds iirc should be shot. Taylor landed the better clean, hard shots and parried and weaved so many of pavliks punchs.

                Ya'll who I owe points too I will pay ya'll now.

                I know this thread will alreayd have been made because people understand boxing and know how to score a fight.

                Kelly Pavlik, one dimensional lucky ****.

                Rant over.
                The word robbery gets thrown about too much for my liking, it was a close fight that could of gone either way, in the end Pavlik outworked Taylor and was the constant aggressor. Just because you see the fight a different way doesn't make it a robbery if it was a robbery then 95 percent of the people would be saying Taylor won plus the punchstats would be big in Taylor's favor please tell me if that is the case ??

                Comment

                • P4PKING_2008
                  Banned
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Aug 2007
                  • 4359
                  • 639
                  • 323
                  • 6,304

                  #118
                  Originally posted by Burning Desire
                  The word robbery gets thrown about too much for my liking, it was a close fight that could of gone either way, in the end Pavlik outworked Taylor and was the constant aggressor. Just because you see the fight a different way doesn't make it a robbery if it was a robbery then 95 percent of the people would be saying Taylor won plus the punchstats would be big in Taylor's favor please tell me if that is the case ??
                  They say he was more accurate so landed the cleaner shots. Pavlik just followed Taylor around the ring jab and then a straight right. He will be exposed very soon.

                  Comment

                  • Jim Jeffries
                    rugged individualist
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Oct 2007
                    • 20740
                    • 1,376
                    • 2,868
                    • 54,838

                    #119
                    Originally posted by p4pking_2007
                    The judge that gave like 8 rounds to pavlik. That is way off. I had Taylor by three rounds and I have watched it twice.
                    I thought it was very close the first time and not that close the second time (in favour of Pavlik), so I don't know what to say. I guess we score fights differently and can agree to disagree.

                    Comment

                    • Cuauhtémoc1520
                      Head Mexican in Charge
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Mar 2007
                      • 20824
                      • 1,666
                      • 569
                      • 35,996

                      #120
                      If you people truly believe that Taylor got robbed, you are either blind or just don't understand boxing. It was a close fight but you can't win if you don't throw punches...BOTTOM LINE.

                      Pavlik's stamina won him that fight and taylor could not come forward and we all know he can't fight going backwards.

                      I'm glad you guys aren't judging fights.......

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP