What a ****ing robbery!!!
Collapse
-
-
Man I really wish race weren't an issue, and with most whites it is not. But the polls speak for themselves. It's a blight on black people, I'm not going to refrain from saying it, because it is in fact true.
I had no dog in the fight, kind of wanted Taylor to win. But Pavlik easily won eight rounds. You could reasonably give him nine.Last edited by kayjay; 02-18-2008, 11:42 AM.Comment
-
Finally, a sensible Taylor fan. I believe the judge that scored it 117-111 was a bit off, but there were a lot of close rounds that could have went either way depending on what you like. The problems arise when you keep giving every close round to the same fighter.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
The word robbery gets thrown about too much for my liking, it was a close fight that could of gone either way, in the end Pavlik outworked Taylor and was the constant aggressor. Just because you see the fight a different way doesn't make it a robbery if it was a robbery then 95 percent of the people would be saying Taylor won plus the punchstats would be big in Taylor's favor please tell me if that is the case ??Taylor won that fight by three rounds. Clearly I downloaded a setanta broadcast of it and it was so unbelievably biased it was untrue. How can a jab, jab, right hand. Beat a better defensively and better offensively fighter? The judge who scored it by about 8 rounds iirc should be shot. Taylor landed the better clean, hard shots and parried and weaved so many of pavliks punchs.
Ya'll who I owe points too I will pay ya'll now.
I know this thread will alreayd have been made because people understand boxing and know how to score a fight.
Kelly Pavlik, one dimensional lucky ****.
Rant over.Comment
-
They say he was more accurate so landed the cleaner shots. Pavlik just followed Taylor around the ring jab and then a straight right. He will be exposed very soon.The word robbery gets thrown about too much for my liking, it was a close fight that could of gone either way, in the end Pavlik outworked Taylor and was the constant aggressor. Just because you see the fight a different way doesn't make it a robbery if it was a robbery then 95 percent of the people would be saying Taylor won plus the punchstats would be big in Taylor's favor please tell me if that is the case ??Comment
-
I thought it was very close the first time and not that close the second time (in favour of Pavlik), so I don't know what to say. I guess we score fights differently and can agree to disagree.Comment
-
If you people truly believe that Taylor got robbed, you are either blind or just don't understand boxing. It was a close fight but you can't win if you don't throw punches...BOTTOM LINE.
Pavlik's stamina won him that fight and taylor could not come forward and we all know he can't fight going backwards.
I'm glad you guys aren't judging fights.......Comment
Comment