This thread is crap. Both guys did well for themselves but the key to winning the fight tonight was based on two things: Kelly Pavlik has a very underated jab, everybody talks about the right hand, but what a jab that guy has.
The 2nd factor was the better stamina of Kelly and the ability to throw alot punches.. I should probally add that Pavliks defense was better than expected to me (as a fan) Some of the people crying foul might not realize just how well Kelly did in blocking so many od Jermains' punches.
All in all, I came away with more respect for Jermain than I ever had, and more confidence that Pavlik has the goods.
Cong**** to both men.
As for all these *******s that have the nerve to talk of a robbery in close fight that their favorite fighter lost, the irony is a bit much.
Pavlik Taylor 2 wasn't nearly as close as Taylor/Wright or Taylor/Hopkins 1.
I find it even more revolting when 2 of the three judges are the same people that GAVE JERMAIN VICTORIES IN FIGHTS AGAINST HOPKINS. Come on people, give it a break already.
The 2nd factor was the better stamina of Kelly and the ability to throw alot punches.. I should probally add that Pavliks defense was better than expected to me (as a fan) Some of the people crying foul might not realize just how well Kelly did in blocking so many od Jermains' punches.
All in all, I came away with more respect for Jermain than I ever had, and more confidence that Pavlik has the goods.
Cong**** to both men.
As for all these *******s that have the nerve to talk of a robbery in close fight that their favorite fighter lost, the irony is a bit much.
Pavlik Taylor 2 wasn't nearly as close as Taylor/Wright or Taylor/Hopkins 1.
I find it even more revolting when 2 of the three judges are the same people that GAVE JERMAIN VICTORIES IN FIGHTS AGAINST HOPKINS. Come on people, give it a break already.
Comment