Would a younger DLH beat Mayweather (in his prime)?

[Jim Jeffries]

Who was he a dominant against? What's his biggest victory against a prime fighter?

Easy there, you're crapping on Floyd's biggest win.

[Vladimir303]

Um.. we're talking about PRIME Oscar here. You do realize that he won a world title at 130, less than 16 months after he turned pro (Floyd won his first in a very commendable 2 years.)

Is that supposed to make it more impressive? Oscar starved himself to make 130 and win that title at 130 against Jim Bradahl who?


Floyd won a title against a more legit champion in Genardo Hernandez who was unbeaten at his natural weight class of 130. Alot of people thought Floyd wasn't experienced enough to beat Hernandez at that time and he dominated.

[Vladimir303]

Easy there, you're crapping on Floyd's biggest win.

A direct answer to the question would of been fine.

[Jim Jeffries]

Not a chance. Mayweather would do him worse then Pernell Whitaker did.

Oscar can't deal with slick fighters.

You don't honestly believe that Pernell won that fight do you?

Is that supposed to make it more impressive? Oscar starved himself to make 130 and win that title at 130 against Jim Bradahl who?


Floyd won a title against a more legit champion in Genardo Hernandez who was unbeaten at his natural weight class of 130. Alot of people thought Floyd wasn't experienced enough to beat Hernandez at that time and he dominated.

You mean the same Genaro Hernandez that Oscar had already soundly beaten? Didn't he retire after the Floyd fight?

[Silencers]

Is that supposed to make it more impressive? Oscar starved himself to make 130 and win that title at 130 against Jim Bradahl who?


Floyd won a title against a more legit champion in Genardo Hernandez who was unbeaten at his natural weight class of 130. Alot of people thought Floyd wasn't experienced enough to beat Hernandez at that time and he dominated.

You do know that DLH beat Genaro Hernandez right?

[beez721]

Oscar was faster and hit harder when he was younger, oscar would've beat floyd in his prime

floyd nuthuggers like to come up with the "oscar lost to the best" **** but atleast he fought the best unlike floyd.

I agree. no question in my mind that a younger dlh would have beaten him. he came close recently and he was much faster and more consistent with his jab when he was younger

[Vladimir303]

You don't honestly believe that Pernell won that fight do you?

Alot of other people do as well. We could debate this thing round for round but is it really worth it? Fact is, Oscar had trouble with a washed up, on crack ******* Pernell Whitaker. Whitaker in his prime would have boxed his socks off.

You mean the same Genaro Hernandez that Oscar had already soundly beaten? Didn't he retire after the Floyd fight?

Yes, his first fight moving up to 135 and he lost. Floyd defeated him at 130, where he was undefeated his entire career.

[Jim Jeffries]

A direct answer to the question would of been fine.

I think Whitaker was still in his prime. He was unbeaten in his previous 26 fights, in the year prior to DLH he had back to back wins over Rivera and stopped the undefeated Hurtado only 2 1/2 months prior.

[Jim Jeffries]

Yes, his first fight moving up to 135 and he lost. Floyd defeated him at 130, where he was undefeated his entire career.

So the Hatton win means absolutely nothing for Floyd, is what you're saying?

[Vladimir303]

So the Hatton win means absolutely nothing for Floyd, is what you're saying?

A former super-featherweight beating a natural jr-welterweight at 147. I don't see the problem. He gave Ricky his first loss.

It should mean something to those who picked Ricky to actually win.