Bernard Hopkins Has Fought In Europe Before

[th4l3pr3ch4un]

doesnt make any difference joe calzaghe is gonna give a boxing lesson on fight night

[Vladimir303]

doesnt make any difference joe calzaghe is gonna give a boxing lesson on fight night

Boxing lesson? I doubt that.

[SHB]

Thank you for contributing absolutely nothing to this topic, ignoring all the facts and insulting a post like a little Kid. You should be proud of yourself.

I am. Thanks. Although you also contributed nothing so that makes us even.

[th4l3pr3ch4un]

okay ill re phrase it... Calzaghe is gonna win 10 out of 12 rounds on fight night

[Vladimir303]

okay ill re phrase it... Calzaghe is gonna win 10 out of 12 rounds on fight night

Let me rephrase. This fight will be a sloppy ugly fight and alot of the rounds will be hard to score. Joe Calzahge already looks very sloppy and with Hopkins enforcing his will on to that style hitting and holding he will make Joe look even more uneffective despite the high work rate of Slappy Joe.

At the end of the day it will go to disatance and nobody in the crowd or watching on TV will be sure who won.

My Official Pick: Bernard Hopkins by majority or split decision. After that we will see alot of Calzaghe stans crying robbery and I will Lmao.

[Guest]

vladimir303 = DIOS = Bozo_No_No.

[Vladimir303]

vladimir303 = DIOS = Bozo_No_No.

I'm not Dios but he is a good poster. Thanks for the comparison.

[Guest]

No, he's a **** poster. Though maybe not as boorish and obnoxious as you.

[Fox McCloud]

Hopkins also fought in Ecuador and drew with Segundo Mercado.

When you draw with a champion in his hometown after getting dropped two times you just know you had to do pretty well in that fight.

The IBF belt was vacant and it was one of those matches where one guy was clearly supposed to win. That guy was Hopkins. That said, I haven't seen the fight, but it's not like the cards were stacked against Hopkins to the point where he would have to **** Mercado up to get a draw I don't think.

[Fox McCloud]

So let's see... both have fought outside their home unified governmental entity's owned territory (that covers my ass for the argument, UK ISN'T A COUNTRY SLAG!!!)...

Neither fight in countries that frequently rob fighters.

What's the problem here again?

Why would one get the nod over the other in this type of comparitive analysis?

No one knows! Certainly I don't.