Should Floyd be stripped of his WW title/s?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • THE REED
    Sixty Forty
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Apr 2007
    • 43489
    • 1,992
    • 1,483
    • 690,068,075

    #131
    Originally posted by deevel79
    How long ago did Oscar accomplish all these great feats? Yes he WAS a great Champ. That cannot be disputed. But the reality is, he's become nothing more than a part-time fighter/promoter.

    Correction! He lost 4 of his last 9. Floyd, Bhop, Sturm, Mosley. Get YOUR facts straight!
    you ba se EVERYTHING on opinion.. I base mine on facts


    you think floyd should be stripped for not defending against a welterweight...

    when you dont realize thats not the rules.... as long as he defends his title against a legitimite ranked fighter deemed by the commission.... FACT


    Oscar won against sturm.... at the end of the day it matters what the judges say and nothing more... FACT

    Comment

    • deevel79
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Dec 2005
      • 6831
      • 213
      • 27
      • 13,404

      #132
      Originally posted by DWiens421
      Lol, so you take the Sturm win away from him, but keep the Mosley L on there?

      How ridiculous of you!

      The Mosley win was contraversial, but CLOSE! Sturm was flat out ROBBED!

      Comment

      • Fox McCloud
        Mission Complete!
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Apr 2007
        • 18176
        • 789
        • 1,151
        • 26,037

        #133
        Originally posted by deevel79
        The Mosley win was contraversial, but CLOSE! Sturm was flat out ROBBED!


        I've heard both things said about both fights.

        Lederman, Foreman, Merchant and Lampley all agreed that De La Hoya easily won.

        Comment

        • deevel79
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Dec 2005
          • 6831
          • 213
          • 27
          • 13,404

          #134
          Originally posted by reedickyaluss
          you ba se EVERYTHING on opinion.. I base mine on facts


          you think floyd should be stripped for not defending against a welterweight...

          when you dont realize thats not the rules.... as long as he defends his title against a legitimite ranked fighter deemed by the commission.... FACT


          Oscar won against sturm.... at the end of the day it matters what the judges say and nothing more... FACT
          In that case, its fair to say that your boy Roy lost in the 88 olympics. Its what the judges say right?

          Comment

          • THE REED
            Sixty Forty
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Apr 2007
            • 43489
            • 1,992
            • 1,483
            • 690,068,075

            #135
            Originally posted by deevel79
            In that case, its fair to say that your boy Roy lost in the 88 olympics. Its what the judges say right?
            yep thats right......

            the only difference is Park Si Hun admitted to roy that roy beat him...

            Comment

            • FloydFanatic
              Lifestyle...flashy
              • Jan 2008
              • 469
              • 51
              • 34
              • 615

              #136
              Originally posted by DWiens421
              Lol, so you take the Sturm win away from him, but keep the Mosley L on there?

              How ridiculous of you!
              hes 1 of the worst posters here. easily. that boy is mad wack.

              Comment

              • THE REED
                Sixty Forty
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Apr 2007
                • 43489
                • 1,992
                • 1,483
                • 690,068,075

                #137
                Originally posted by deevel79
                In that case, its fair to say that your boy Roy lost in the 88 olympics. Its what the judges say right?
                Jones dominated his opponents, never losing a single round on route to the final. His participation in the final proved to be hugely controversial when he lost a highly disputed 3-2 decision in the final. Jones lost to South Korean fighter Park Si-Hun, despite pummeling Park for three rounds, landing 86 punches to Park's 32. Allegedly, Park himself apologized to Jones afterwards. One judge shortly thereafter admitted the decision was a mistake, and all three judges voting against Jones were eventually suspended. Most observers still believe the judges were either bribed or otherwise coerced to vote for the local fighter by Korean officials. However, the official IOC investigation concluding in 1997 found that 3 of the judges were wined and dined by Korean officials, but the IOC still officially stands by the decision.



                Slightly different story

                Comment

                • Scott9945
                  Gonna be more su****ious
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Mar 2007
                  • 22032
                  • 741
                  • 1,371
                  • 30,075

                  #138
                  Originally posted by DWiens421


                  I've heard both things said about both fights.

                  Lederman, Foreman, Merchant and Lampley all agreed that De La Hoya easily won.
                  If you're referring to the Sturm fight, Roy Jones was doing the HBO commentary and he definitely thought Sturm won. He was almost ecstatic when Oscar was eating jabs in the second half of that fight. I can't remember about the others.

                  Comment

                  • FloydFanatic
                    Lifestyle...flashy
                    • Jan 2008
                    • 469
                    • 51
                    • 34
                    • 615

                    #139
                    Originally posted by reedickyaluss
                    Jones dominated his opponents, never losing a single round on route to the final. His participation in the final proved to be hugely controversial when he lost a highly disputed 3-2 decision in the final. Jones lost to South Korean fighter Park Si-Hun, despite pummeling Park for three rounds, landing 86 punches to Park's 32. Allegedly, Park himself apologized to Jones afterwards. One judge shortly thereafter admitted the decision was a mistake, and all three judges voting against Jones were eventually suspended. Most observers still believe the judges were either bribed or otherwise coerced to vote for the local fighter by Korean officials. However, the official IOC investigation concluding in 1997 found that 3 of the judges were wined and dined by Korean officials, but the IOC still officially stands by the decision.



                    Slightly different story

                    ahaha deevel got . strait up son

                    Comment

                    • deevel79
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Dec 2005
                      • 6831
                      • 213
                      • 27
                      • 13,404

                      #140
                      Originally posted by reedickyaluss
                      yep thats right......

                      the only difference is Park Si Hun admitted to roy that roy beat him...
                      Did u see Oscar's face during and after the decision? If that wasnt a look of defeat, i dont know what is! He knew he lost.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP