Greetings,
First time post here. I joined this forum to get the truth, sotospeak from the horse's mouth, regarding boxing.
I'm not a boxer, but in my studies of another form of fighting, Jeet Kune Do (JKD), I've come to respect boxing's influence on JKD. I realize my question might be like 'preaching to the choir', but there seems to be a disparaging outlook towards boxing in other martial arts groups, particularly the Wing Tsun (WT)group(s).
My training in JKD has obviously included having an understanding of Wing Chun, as JKD's founder started in Wing Chun, and he relied heavily on the principles of Wing Chun as well as boxing.
Of note, the WT groups seem to use boxing as an example of inefficient techniques whenever they teach to their students.
I personally think both are good in their own right, but I thought it would be wise hear from boxers themselves on their view of WT.
Lastly, I tend to think it's the man himself that determines the victor, not the style, art, etc.
regards,
Eric
First time post here. I joined this forum to get the truth, sotospeak from the horse's mouth, regarding boxing.
I'm not a boxer, but in my studies of another form of fighting, Jeet Kune Do (JKD), I've come to respect boxing's influence on JKD. I realize my question might be like 'preaching to the choir', but there seems to be a disparaging outlook towards boxing in other martial arts groups, particularly the Wing Tsun (WT)group(s).
My training in JKD has obviously included having an understanding of Wing Chun, as JKD's founder started in Wing Chun, and he relied heavily on the principles of Wing Chun as well as boxing.
Of note, the WT groups seem to use boxing as an example of inefficient techniques whenever they teach to their students.
I personally think both are good in their own right, but I thought it would be wise hear from boxers themselves on their view of WT.
Lastly, I tend to think it's the man himself that determines the victor, not the style, art, etc.
regards,
Eric
Comment