Ok here's what I don't get...

[Azteca]

It's not an opinion.

He has a win over Ben Tackie and Arturo Gatti.

I am not even going to count that Contender ****...those were more like exhibition matches then real fights ya dig.

Bruseles has got...no ****ing one.

[javelin_fangs]

i dont get why floyd hates arum so much....arum overpaid him for years....considering his lack of following.....kinda like juan diaz is overpaid by don king (again sonsidering his lack of following)but now pays the consequences and gets screwed....its their own fault for getting with the most possessive double-faced promoters...

I'm just guessing, but I think it has to do with the fact that Arum was constantly saying Black fighters can't become stars anymore and that Mayweather doesn't deserve to be on PPV or to have the long term deal that Arum got him.

The last part is dumb, but the other two are Arum's job and the sole reason why a fighter like Mayweather pays a promoter like Arum. Mayweather is better off sailing his own ship, but he should do business with Arum for one fight...Cotto. Swallow your pride Floyd. Cotto is a good fight for you.

[javelin_fangs]

It's not an opinion.

He has a win over Ben Tackie and Arturo Gatti.

I am not even going to count that Contender ****...those were more like exhibition matches then real fights ya dig.

Bruseles has got...no ****ing one.

He beat Bazan, Lau, Urena, Negron and Julio. Don't tell me you haven't heard of them...and you're calling me a noob?

[Azteca]

I've heard of Bazan.

The rest aren't good.....cause I haven't heard of them. Newb.

[javelin_fangs]

I've heard of Bazan.

The rest aren't good.....cause I haven't heard of them. Newb.

So, let me get this straight. The barometer for how good someone is depends on whether or not you've heard of him?

So, conceivably, if you have heard of Marteze Logan, but not oh I don't know Amir Khan then Logan would be better than Khan. Or how about this one...if you'd heard of Peter McKneely, but not Steve Cunningham then McKneely would be better.

ROTFLMAO...you just made my day. That was the funniest thing I've read. With that I'm off to other ****. Night folks. I'm sure we'll be revisiting similar arguments the next time I sign on.

[Azteca]

So, let me get this straight. The barometer for how good someone is depends on whether or not you've heard of him?

So, conceivably, if you have heard of Marteze Logan, but not oh I don't know Amir Khan then Logan would be better than Khan. Or how about this one...if you'd heard of Peter McKneely, but not Steve Cunningham then McKneely would be better.

ROTFLMAO...you just made my day. That was the funniest thing I've read. With that I'm off to other ****. Night folks. I'm sure we'll be revisiting similar arguments the next time I sign on.

Pretty much.

I know the most abotu boxing on the board.

Dont believe me?

Ask Dweins. hehehehe.

But I have heard of the guys you mentioned up top.

But not Lau, Negron adn the other bloke.

Who...are they??????

[SkillspayBills]

I've heard of Bazan.

The rest aren't good.....cause I haven't heard of them. Newb.

For the record me DD an DW totally ****ted on you, Wiley and Eason.

[Azteca]

......right.....

[Haterfree]

Tito hadn't fought in almost 3 years.

Oscar was a 6-1 underdog against Hopkins.

Mosley was 35 years old.

Oscar is 35 and is 10 years past his peak (as #1 p4p back in 1998,) has had 2 fights in the last 3 years and has lost 3 (arguably 4) of his last 5 fights. Beating him once meant something, but beating him again clearly means nothing.

Dude why do you think you can split Oscars career up in sections? 10 years or 5 fights in a row that you find are relevant doesnt mean anything. The fact is Oscar is a HOF fighter. Not Cotto, Williams, Cintron or Margarito can claim their next opponent is definitely a HOF fighter but Floyd can because we know he is fighting Oscar next.