Pacquiao/JMM 1 decision

[DrewWoodside]

happy's trolling.. no cal bashin threads!

[RageX]

There are many intangibles as to why the fight went that way.

And no way did JMM win 10 rounds.

JMM won rounds in succession but never 10 rounds. Stats of the fight showed that JMM would land 2-3 punches more in this round then Pac will win the next round by landing more.

Also let's not forget the HORRIFIC and NIGHTMARISH punishment A GREEN Pac inflicted upon JMM.

Pac broke his nose, he bleed JMM the whole fight with cuts all over the face, JMM was forced to breath his own blood and taste it.

And this type of damage was inflicted by Pac when he was still a one-hand puncher with no footwork and little boxing skills.

The punishment that JMM had to endure was such a horrific experience that JMM ran from the rematch.

Let's add also that Pac injured his left hand early when it collided in the nose-bone of JMM. Pac blistered his foot also.

The rematch will settle once and for all who is the better man.

And also for the idiot Fake FLoyd fans.

I got a question for ya and it's answerable by common sense.

Which is more deserving of being called the best fighting a blown-up welter or fighting someone who's ranked number 3 in most p4p?

I'd shudder to think there are idiots who will answer fighting a blown up welter. lols.

Stop sucking Pacquiao's **** when you can clearly kiss his better.

[RageX]

Are you an idiot or what?

Read my post.

And dude watch the fight again.

Bwahahaha Pacquiao = Fraud who waits for fighters to get out of their prime or till they lose.

Pacquiao got KO'd by Midget Singsurat Pwnedddd

[loui_ludwig]

this is what i'm saying, according to what the jduges said, with correction to the error, pacquiao wins..the great disparity between the scores however shows how ridiculous the judges and teh system is

Some judges, so called experts, and fans go for the skills, some for the punchers. The last 2x i watched the fight, i have it 6-6. On JMM's 6 rounds, his counter punching skills won him. On Pac's rounds, even though he was countered, Pac was throwing and landed more punches than JMM.

Here and other forums, nuthuggers will say Pac won but haters said JMM won. Lederman had it for Pac, 115-110. Merchant has it for Pac on a close decision. If that judge said he made a mistake, then he should have score it 10-6. If he did not think he made a mistake, then he should have said that according to rules, he did not have to score that round a 10-6.

[DrewWoodside]

Some judges, so called experts, and fans go for the skills, some for the punchers. The last 2x i watched the fight, i have it 6-6. On JMM's 6 rounds, his counter punching skills won him. On Pac's rounds, even though he was countered, Pac was throwing and landed more punches than JMM.

Here and other forums, nuthuggers will say Pac won but haters said JMM won. Lederman had it for Pac, 115-110. Merchant has it for Pac on a close decision. If that judge said he made a mistake, then he should have score it 10-6. If he did not think he made a mistake, then he should have said that according to rules, he did not have to score that round a 10-6.

Right and from what I understand he said he made a mistake. My guess is that that judge intended on tallying his card to a Draw. He made an error with the 7-10. Had he realized it what he was doing and that it would be criticized he would have made it 6-10 and given JMM another round later in the fight and still scored it a draw.

[JoartCC]

Stop sucking Pacquiao's **** when you can clearly kiss his better.

Actually you should stop sucking Gayweather's.

I find it funny that COwards love Gayweather.

Like you.

[JoartCC]

Bwahahaha Pacquiao = Fraud who waits for fighters to get out of their prime or till they lose.

Pacquiao got KO'd by Midget Singsurat Pwnedddd

Here's a penny for your trouble.

I don't need to respond to a complete idiot like you.

Your mama didn't send you to school eh?

[Fox McCloud]

First... Bert Clements is a ****ing idiot for not knowing what he can and can't do in his job as a judge. ****ing moron.

It's like the Lewis-Holyfield I incident, when Larry O'Connell went back to England said he ****ed up... Lewis should have won. Pacquiao should have won, but some quota-filling ****** was put into the judging pool. That is unfortunate.

Honestly, I felt Marquez should have won the fight, but I am not a good judge... so I can accept a draw, or a win for either fighter. Even if Pacquiao deserved the win, that fight did leave a lot of questions for him... like, how do you lose enough rounds to make a draw appropriate after a 10-6 round (or even 10-7 on one card).

This rematch is going to be good, because it will get this question out of the way for Pacquiao's career (or Marquez's for that matter, if he wins).

[Silencers]

The rematch should end most of the controversy. I had Pacquiao winning the fight but Marquez won more rounds.

[DURAN_IS_GOD]

im willing to place 10k on marquez to win.... anybody wanna take that bet?