Johnny Tapia Vs Manny Pac

[We want Floyd]

In Their Primes Who Do You Think Wins. Just To Stop You Now, The Fight Between Tapia And Barrera, Tapia Could'nt Throw A Left Cause His Sholder Was Torn, But Still Went The 12. I Think It Would Be A Tapia Victory

To mention Tapia's name in the same sentence w/ Manny's is an insult to PAC. PACMAN would've obliterated Tapia to pieces, he wouldn't have to go through multiple suicide attempts if PAC got his paws on him.

Forget PAC, Gerry Penalosa in his prime would've smoked Tapia, which is a more fair matchup since GP and JT are closer in weightclass. Well, it actually wouldn't have been fair since GP would've lit his ass up.

[ferocity]

To mention Tapia's name in the same sentence w/ Manny's is an insult to PAC. PACMAN would've obliterated Tapia to pieces, he wouldn't have to go through multiple suicide attempts if PAC got his paws on him.

Forget PAC, Gerry Penalosa in his prime would've smoked Tapia, which is a more fair matchup since GP and JT are closer in weightclass. Well, it actually wouldn't have been fair since GP would've lit his ass up.

some of you pinoys really like to over rate your fighters, lmao

[ferocity]

Danny Romero had great power. And couldn't dent Tapia, Pacquiao aint' going to ko Tapia, Tapia is too slick and his speed is greater.

Sure Tapia likes to trade with his opponets but he is very smart about, just look at how he fought Romero a big puncher.

Marquez and Tapia two great boxers, and just as Marquez schooled Pacquiao Tapia would outbox him would even toy with Pacquiao.

Look at the Solis fight!!! Pacquioa came at Solis full speed and all he hit was air. Not till Pacquiao settled down did he start landing on the plain Solis. And Tapis is anything but plain. Tapia lets remember can make a fighter miss punchs will he is in front of him and he's done this many times.

Why is it when Pacquiao is matched up with anyone especially Mexican, his fans think Pacquiao is immune to defeat? lmao,

[Mr. Ryan]

Danny Romero had great power. And couldn't dent Tapia, Pacquiao aint' going to ko Tapia, Tapia is too slick and his speed is greater.

Sure Tapia likes to trade with his opponets but he is very smart about, just look at how he fought Romero a big puncher.

Marquez and Tapia two great boxers, and just as Marquez schooled Pacquiao Tapia would outbox him would even toy with Pacquiao.

Look at the Solis fight!!! Pacquioa came at Solis full speed and all he hit was air. Not till Pacquiao settled down did he start landing on the plain Solis. And Tapis is anything but plain. Tapia lets remember can make a fighter miss punchs will he is in front of him and he's done this many times.

Why is it when Pacquiao is matched up with anyone especially Mexican, his fans think Pacquiao is immune to defeat? lmao,

I am aware of Pacquiao's vulnerability, but I don't think Tapia would've had much chance. Danny Romero is no Manny Pacquiao. Romero wasn't a puncher at 122, Pacquiao was smoking guys with one shot at that weight. You can't use Romero as a measuring stick for how Tapia would fare against Pacquiao's power.

Tapia was at his prime at 115, then by 126 he was getting overwhelmed by Manuel Medina. Pacquiao knocked out Barrera, Morales, and an assortment of much bigger fighters past 126 pounds. I don't even think Tapia would have enough power to earn respect from Pacquiao and wear him down.

It's telling that Pacquiao sought a fight with Paulie Ayala at 122, but was turned down. That same Ayala holds 2 wins over Tapia at 118.

[xcaret]

To mention Tapia's name in the same sentence w/ Manny's is an insult to PAC. PACMAN would've obliterated Tapia to pieces, he wouldn't have to go through multiple suicide attempts if PAC got his paws on him.

Forget PAC, Gerry Penalosa in his prime would've smoked Tapia, which is a more fair matchup since GP and JT are closer in weightclass. Well, it actually wouldn't have been fair since GP would've lit his ass up.

Says a guy thats never seen a Tapia fight or even know who the *** he is... gtfo you little *****...


Gerry Penalosa?? HAHAHA... that ***ing bum ? Who did he beat in his "prime?" a bunch of nobodys, his biggest win til now is against a Gonzalez who everyone knows he got lucky, not to mention the weight problems Gonzalez had for the fight.

[pelonxsoldier28]

Damn I Did'nt Think My Thread Would Have Gotten This Much Attention. I've Heard Some Crazy **** On Here. Imo Tapia Would Have Givin Pac A Real Challenge. Tapia Was'nt Just At His Prime At Super Fly, He Was An Ibf Champion At Fetherweight. Later In His Career The Drugs Took Over, But He Was Still One Tough ****er.

[ferocity]

I am aware of Pacquiao's vulnerability, but I don't think Tapia would've had much chance. Danny Romero is no Manny Pacquiao. Romero wasn't a puncher at 122, Pacquiao was smoking guys with one shot at that weight. You can't use Romero as a measuring stick for how Tapia would fare against Pacquiao's power.

Tapia was at his prime at 115, then by 126 he was getting overwhelmed by Manuel Medina. Pacquiao knocked out Barrera, Morales, and an assortment of much bigger fighters past 126 pounds. I don't even think Tapia would have enough power to earn respect from Pacquiao and wear him down.

It's telling that Pacquiao sought a fight with Paulie Ayala at 122, but was turned down. That same Ayala holds 2 wins over Tapia at 118.

The way you talk about Ayayla you make one think you belive Ayala won the fights. Proving you don't know what you're talking about. And 126 wasn't Tapia prime. ****, if you really want to talk primes, well reality is 3 years of Tapias career were taken away because he was messing with drugs if not the skys the limit and even then he still became a great fighter.

Romero was the harderst puncher in and around the division at the time so yes, i can use Romero as a messuring stick. Truth is Romero never really found his style as a pro, always switching between boxing and slugging when he had the power to be a pure power slugger and ko fighters out of there. But i know you know nothing about Romero so im wasting my time talking about Romero with you.

Tapia would get Pacquiao respect or Pacquiao will look more foolish then he did when Marquez was out boxing him. Don't under estimate Tapias boxing skills, or his will which would be hard to penetrate.

Whats even funnier is how you say Tapia would have no chance lol, yeah Jorge Solis a ****ty fighter make Pacquiao look ****** and you're telling me Tapia has no chance sure buddy.

[M Deezy]

at johnnys prime weight he would be pac down!

[Mr. Ryan]

The way you talk about Ayayla you make one think you belive Ayala won the fights. Proving you don't know what you're talking about. And 126 wasn't Tapia prime. ****, if you really want to talk primes, well reality is 3 years of Tapias career were taken away because he was messing with drugs if not the skys the limit and even then he still became a great fighter.

Romero was the harderst puncher in and around the division at the time so yes, i can use Romero as a messuring stick. Truth is Romero never really found his style as a pro, always switching between boxing and slugging when he had the power to be a pure power slugger and ko fighters out of there. But i know you know nothing about Romero so im wasting my time talking about Romero with you.

Tapia would get Pacquiao respect or Pacquiao will look more foolish then he did when Marquez was out boxing him. Don't under estimate Tapias boxing skills, or his will which would be hard to penetrate.

Whats even funnier is how you say Tapia would have no chance lol, yeah Jorge Solis a ****ty fighter make Pacquiao look ****** and you're telling me Tapia has no chance sure buddy.

Haha, if Bert Sugar was on here and he disagreed with you you'd try your best to discredit him too. So I'm in good company I guess LOL.

You talk about Tapia wasting his prime, how would a guy who wasted his prime have a chance with a Pacquiao that ran Barrera and Morales out of the ring? Get real. What's next, are you going to argue about how James Toney would've beaten Marvin Hagler in his prime, if he didn't waste it? Give me a break.

Who hits harder, Romero or Pacquiao? Who is the better fighter, Romero or Pacquiao. If you even try to say some ****** stuff about Romero being better in any quality than Pacquiao, I will put that in my sig for everyone to laugh at how much of a nuthugger you are.

Romero was only a big puncher at 112-115 and over that he was just an above average puncher. Vuyani Bungu was past his prime and still had enough to beat Romero, and Romero never stunned him.

Ayala is no puncher and he outpunched Tapia for long stretches of both fights. You can make an argument for Tapia in the second fight but the first was an Ayala victory clearly. I like Tapia alot, and even I couldn't justify giving him that fight. Tapia was too open for the southpaw right hooks and body shots. What if Pacquiao was hitting him instead?

Marquez is one situation, where he is a strong puncher at higher weights and could absorb Pacquiao's shots reasonably. To talk about a natural 115 pounder beating a guy who KOs 130 pounders is just you being a nuthugger to the max.

BTW, I'm interviewing Victor Ortiz tommorrow. You have any questions?

[ferocity]

Haha, if Bert Sugar was on here and he disagreed with you you'd try your best to discredit him too. So I'm in good company I guess LOL.

You talk about Tapia wasting his prime, how would a guy who wasted his prime have a chance with a Pacquiao that ran Barrera and Morales out of the ring? Get real. What's next, are you going to argue about how James Toney would've beaten Marvin Hagler in his prime, if he didn't waste it? Give me a break.

Who hits harder, Romero or Pacquiao? Who is the better fighter, Romero or Pacquiao. If you even try to say some ****** stuff about Romero being better in any quality than Pacquiao, I will put that in my sig for everyone to laugh at how much of a nuthugger you are.

Romero was only a big puncher at 112-115 and over that he was just an above average puncher. Vuyani Bungu was past his prime and still had enough to beat Romero, and Romero never stunned him.

Ayala is no puncher and he outpunched Tapia for long stretches of both fights. You can make an argument for Tapia in the second fight but the first was an Ayala victory clearly. I like Tapia alot, and even I couldn't justify giving him that fight. Tapia was too open for the southpaw right hooks and body shots. What if Pacquiao was hitting him instead?

Marquez is one situation, where he is a strong puncher at higher weights and could absorb Pacquiao's shots reasonably. To talk about a natural 115 pounder beating a guy who KOs 130 pounders is just you being a nuthugger to the max.

BTW, I'm interviewing Victor Ortiz tommorrow. You have any questions?

Its really easy to tell when your Pacquiao nuthugger instincts take in effect.

When Pacquiao was in Romeros division Romero beats Pacquiao! Put that in your sig!!

Comparing yourself to Sugar, so i guess your colleges think you make idiot remarks.

Prime for Prime puts a fighter at there best at an equal weight what ever that may be. Pacquiao has problems with boxer. And Marquez as great as he is isn't anything like Tapia was. Tapia can outbox you and still make you look like a fool.

So you had Bungu ahead did you....lmao, "He ain't getting no chesse on his hamburger."

Bungu came on in the later rounds, and still wasn't enough to win the fight. Hamed wanted Bungu, Hamed would never have fought Romero had he got the decision. Bungu also had the referre help him out with instructing Romero how to fight that Foreman was outraged.

Under rate Romero all you want your ass would still want to take a picture with him, lmao!! At the time he was the 1st American in some 60 years to become champion at that weight when he beat Tejedor.

So Bungu was out of his prime? Before Romero i belive he has just beaten McKinney again. For an old man he sure didn't fade in the late round, with his old legs and all. He folded in front of Hamed somthing Romero never would have done.

Barrera and Morales were old fighters. Call it like it is don't bull**** yourself. Every time Morales face Pacquiao he was coming off a lose, how funny is that. And Barrera was off a lose to Marquez too, lmao. Manny Pacquiao and everybody else followed Erik Morales or else Pacquiao would still be at 126 and weight drained.

I didn't say he wasted his prime if i did, what i ment is he would have had a longer reign as champion and stayed in his prime a lot longer because he would be younger and dominating.

To you and the nuthuggers pacquiao loses to no one.

So you think you're on bert sugars level, lmao.