Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mikkel Kessler vs Chad Dawson @ 175

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by WLAD OWNS View Post
    How am I being racist???
    You are a biased one.

    Don't you people agree?

    Comment


    • #22
      Adamek is good fighter that I like but he's really just a pretty good 3rd line grinder and that's the best guy Dawsom beat and he got knocked down.

      I dont even know that he's the best light heavyweight which maybe is kinda of a shallow division right now.

      Kessler would beat him most likely especially he was agressive.

      Pavlik would beat him because he's tall and hard to move/run from and agressive power puncher.

      Comment


      • #23
        Dawson is fast and slick and would beat the very technically sound Kessler. This is a bout I would love to see.

        Comment


        • #24
          it's actually comical how much your overrating him. Chad Dawson the world beater of world beaters. Stops anyone.

          Comment


          • #25
            dawson close UD

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by slicksouthpaw16 View Post
              Kessler has already shown that he can not compete with slick southpaws that fight for the full 12 rounds. Dawson by UD or late knockout.
              I disagree I think the reason he lost that fight was because calzaghe is just better, better than Dawson (at least right now) and Calzaghe's style is not anywhere the near the same as Dawsons the term "Slick Southpaw" is too much of a generalisation. It would be a close, great fight.
              Last edited by Ryn0; 12-28-2007, 06:12 PM.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by WLAD OWNS View Post
                How am I being racist???
                when ever there is a thread envolving a black fighter against a white fighter, even though you know that the black fighter would win, you just pick the white fighter because you dont like black people. i think it started with the Bernard Hopkins/Joe Calzaghe thing.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by The Troll View Post
                  Adamek is good fighter that I like but he's really just a pretty good 3rd line grinder and that's the best guy Dawsom beat and he got knocked down.

                  I dont even know that he's the best light heavyweight which maybe is kinda of a shallow division right now.

                  Kessler would beat him most likely especially he was agressive.

                  Pavlik would beat him because he's tall and hard to move/run from and agressive power puncher.
                  LMAO! be real, you are in denial. now tell us what you really think. Pavlik and Kessler would beat Dawson LOL! they both are way to robotic. Pavlik especially is not in Dawsons league.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    " when ever there is a thread envolving a black fighter against a white fighter, even though you know that the black fighter would win, you just pick the white fighter because you dont like black people. i think it started with the Bernard Hopkins/Joe Calzaghe thing."

                    ^^^^^^ basically....

                    wlad owns clearly considers race in every fight...

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Dawson is a hell of a boxer, but he is not much better than Kessler in terms of boxing. I might be the only one who thinks this, but Dawson doesnt seem very tough. Kessler is good enough to tap Dawson's chin, at this stage of Dawson's career, he is entirely to chinny. He seems that he gets complacent and stands right in front of his opponents (adamek) which would be suicide vs. kessler.
                      Right now, Kessler by KO.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP