Listen you self righteous prick.
Do you know what colour I am for starters?
Or my Wife or my children?
Like I said before I will forgive you for being dumb....
But if you continue to be dumb I may just get tired of you and retract my forgiveness.
This isn't about your wife or your children. They may be bigots or not byt they aren't posting.
This is about you. You throwing out racist barbs wherever it suits you in place of a wit you obviously lack and for your miniscule infantile understanding of boxing. Don't be mad because SOI owned you with completeness (a none too hard task) as you flailed about like a kid who had their knuckles rapped for ****ting himself in class. Your retorts consist of racial epithets and nothing on topic.
His wins over Duran, Hearns and his loss to Leonard don't count then. Funny how history remembers Hagler as a nobody that beat naturally smaller opponents, but got beat by a blown up welterweight
Please tel me who Hopkins beat of just Hearns Calibre.
Just Hearns alone.
This isn't about your wife or your children. They may be bigots or not byt they aren't posting.
This is about you. You throwing out racist barbs wherever it suits you in place of a wit you obviously lack and for your miniscule infantile understanding of boxing. Don't be mad because SOI owned you with completeness (a none too hard task) as you flailed about like a kid who had their knuckles rapped for ****ting himself in class. Your retorts consist of racial epithets and nothing on topic.
Congratulations: you fit the mold.
So very wrong yet again.
My forgiveness is retracted.
You obviously are missing the Euro DNA.
Just because Bernard isn't exciting doesn't mean he's not a legend. Nobody said Bernard would beat Hagler, Hearns, or Leonard. Hopkins happened to do his thing when there weren't any great middleweights around. 20 defenses is still 20 defenses. Keep in mind he's still winning and he's in his 40's. He's one of the most intelligent fighters in the sport, and is the best middleweight of his era.
Just because Bernard isn't exciting doesn't mean he's not a legend. Nobody said Bernard would beat Hagler, Hearns, or Leonard. Hopkins happened to do his thing when there weren't any great middleweights around. 20 defenses is still 20 defenses. Keep in mind he's still winning and he's in his 40's. He's one of the most intelligent fighters in the sport, and is the best middleweight of his era.
Hopkins did his thing when there were no competition?
He lost to the best he faced his own size.
True or false?
He lost to RJJ who vacated and moved up.
Hopkins could have followed but fortunately for him he had a DIRE division of talentless fighters to play with.
Throw in the fact he was a light heavy weight boiling down he was no better than the school bully picking on smaller men.
Then astonishingly the fist guy his own size half decent comes along he loses.
How can you be a legend without beating TRUE quality opposition who are FAMED for fighting in the same weight class?
Comment