Hopkins....Legend in his own Mind?

[moofo]

Gee, racist much?

If you can't see the irony then I forgive you for being dumb.
Sonofadissolusionedperson is the most Racist of all members on this forum.
BUT he seems to get away with it.

[-EX-]

Hopkins resume ****s on Calzaghe's any day of the week.

[ИATAS]

You are american so you can not be objective on this.

being amerikan has nothing to do with it, i'm one of the most anti-amerikan amerikans you'll ever talk to

[moofo]

Hopkins lost to the best He faced.
True or false?

[ИATAS]

False. He beat oscar, tito, tarver and winky.

He lost two very close, controversial fights to Taylor. In no way was he once hurt or in trouble in all 24 rounds. His only fault was not being as active as he could have been in the early rounds.

And if you're referring to Jones, then yes, he lost to him fair and square. Roy was the better fighter at that time (which doesn't mean **** because Jones is a legend himself and probably unstoppable in those days).

[StackMo]

If you can't see the irony then I forgive you for being dumb.
Sonofadissolusionedperson is the most Racist of all members on this forum.
BUT he seems to get away with it.

You've gotten away with it thus far. Someone as obviously biased as yourself has no issue doing it and so you are hardly in a position to accuse anyone else of it.

Act like he's white and see if you still feel the need to sling racist epithets and insults at anyone who dare point the obvious to you.

[moofo]

False. He beat oscar, tito, tarver and winky.

He lost two very close, controversial fights to Taylor. In no way was he once hurt or in trouble in all 24 rounds. His only fault was not being as active as he could have been in the early rounds.

And if you're referring to Jones, then yes, he lost to him fair and square. Roy was the better fighter at that time (which doesn't mean **** because Jones is a legend himself and probably unstoppable in those days).

Did he lose to the best he faced?
True or false?
Oscar & Tito were NOT the best he faced as they were naturally smaller men who were out of their Weight class...whether you like it or not.
In history they will NEVER be remembered as Middleweights.
So answer the question.
True or false?

[moofo]

You've gotten away with it thus far. Someone as obviously biased as yourself has no issue doing it and so you are hardly in a position to accuse anyone else of it.

Act like he's white and see if you still feel the need to sling racist epithets and insults at anyone who dare point the obvious to you.

Listen you self righteous prick.
Do you know what colour I am for starters?
Or my Wife or my children?
Like I said before I will forgive you for being dumb....
But if you continue to be dumb I may just get tired of you and retract my forgiveness.

[ИATAS]

Did he lose to the best he faced?
True or false?
Oscar & Tito were NOT the best he faced as they were naturally smaller men who were out of their Weight class...whether you like it or not.
In history they will NEVER be remembered as Middleweights.
So answer the question.
True or false?

Pfft. Did Marvin Hagler beat the best he faced?

His wins over Duran, Hearns and his loss to Leonard don't count then. Funny how history remembers Hagler as a nobody that beat naturally smaller opponents, but got beat by a blown up welterweight

[moofo]

One more question for you Bore-hard lovers.
Right now we have people who request fight downloads for Real legends such as Ali & Tyson etc.....
These people weren't even born or old enough to even remember these guys.
YET their reputation preceeds them.
In another 20 years time how many people will request to see Borehards fights?
I am willing to bet those that do will be very dissappointed because the simple TRUTH is he is about as exciting as watching the Whitehouse Xmas Video starring those lousy Scottish Terriers.
In fact those terriers leave Better parcels on the Whitehouse carpet than Borehards Resume.