Margarito who?
Collapse
-
because the real boxing fans know margarito is not a bum. he was a huge welterweight with pressure fighting style power a good chin and he had not lost in 11 years. he was the most accomplished welterweight at the time and ring magazine had him ranked for years as #1 at welterweight and #2 behind mayweather when he came to welterweight.Non sequitur... You don't make sense.
I haven't changed the subject. I'm merely trying to understand the logic. If people are claiming that Gatti and Baldy were bums on Floyd's resume, then why on earth would Floyd want to waste his time filling his resume with yet another bum in Margarito? He's already beaten much better people.
to put it easy for you to read he was in the same position that cotto is in now and just like margarito cotto is getting ducked to.Comment
-
I rated you low like weeks ago, get a grip. You are a **** poster with below average intelligence, why would I give you a HIGH rating and why do you bring this up now?
Maybe Lewis gave you a low rating today, but I don't blame him. You never make any sense and don't even try to..
Comment
-
First of all, you are ******ed if you think that didnt make sense. You admitted that Floyd cherry picked Gatti and Baldomir, face the facts.Non sequitur... You don't make sense.
I haven't changed the subject. I'm merely trying to understand the logic. If people are claiming that Gatti and Baldy were bums on Floyd's resume, then why on earth would Floyd want to waste his time filling his resume with yet another bum in Margarito? He's already beaten much better people.
Second, you are turning this into floyd vs margarito instead of should floyd have fought margarito? Floyd being better than margarito is irrelevant, Oscar shouldnt have fought half the ppl on his resume by that inane logic because he is better than Vargas, Mosley, Mayweather, etc. You fight the best to be the best, margarito was ranked #1.Comment
-
you clearly said that beating a bum with 4 losses would prove nothing. i posted records of 2 fighters who had more than 4 losses at the time Floyd fought them. you can dance around that all you want, ignore and take it out of context all you want, you just make yourself seem less of a boxing fan, and more of a groupie fanatic.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
One of them has a better resume than Marg and another had the lineal title, including a better resume than Marg, hence they've at least proven themselves to an extent. Margarito has only proven that he has a ****ty promoter (at least now) who can't get him decent fights and when he does, he (Marg) gets embarrassed and exposed.
Point being that you posted their current records, which is ****** as ****.
You're obviously biased and are either incompetent and don't understand, or like to play real dirty.
Why communicate in sign language? You ******ed or something? If you are, my bad.Last edited by sonofisis; 12-20-2007, 01:12 PM.Comment
-
margarito is a top 20 p4p fighters. hes no bum. if hes a bum why not take $8 million to fight him??
would you turn down even $1 million to fight a man who you know you would beat easy???Comment
Comment