Margarito who?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sonofisis
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jun 2005
    • 3241
    • 233
    • 78
    • 9,871

    #31
    Originally posted by 2501
    Are you really this much of an idiot? I mean, I would have assumed you had some level of intelligence. They had A LOT more losses than 4 before meeting with Floyd you giant cumbucket. Jesus.
    You're calling me an idiot for nothing. I asked you a simple question and that was "why did you post their current records, post Floyd Mayweather as if it reflects anything? The insults only allude to your limited vocabulary and immaturity.

    Comment

    • pride
      Banned
      Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
      • Dec 2007
      • 97
      • 6
      • 0
      • 137

      #32
      Originally posted by sonofisis
      Non sequitur... You don't make sense.



      I haven't changed the subject. I'm merely trying to understand the logic. If people are claiming that Gatti and Baldy were bums on Floyd's resume, then why on earth would Floyd want to waste his time filling his resume with yet another bum in Margarito? He's already beaten much better people.
      because the real boxing fans know margarito is not a bum. he was a huge welterweight with pressure fighting style power a good chin and he had not lost in 11 years. he was the most accomplished welterweight at the time and ring magazine had him ranked for years as #1 at welterweight and #2 behind mayweather when he came to welterweight.

      to put it easy for you to read he was in the same position that cotto is in now and just like margarito cotto is getting ducked to.

      Comment

      • sonofisis
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jun 2005
        • 3241
        • 233
        • 78
        • 9,871

        #33
        Originally posted by 2501
        HAHA! aww, did i hurt your feelings isis and lewis? you ******* actually rated me low you skirt wearing ****s?
        I rated you low like weeks ago, get a grip. You are a **** poster with below average intelligence, why would I give you a HIGH rating and why do you bring this up now?

        Maybe Lewis gave you a low rating today, but I don't blame him. You never make any sense and don't even try to..

        Comment

        • BmoreBrawler
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jul 2006
          • 4594
          • 130
          • 315
          • 11,672

          #34
          Originally posted by sonofisis
          Non sequitur... You don't make sense.



          I haven't changed the subject. I'm merely trying to understand the logic. If people are claiming that Gatti and Baldy were bums on Floyd's resume, then why on earth would Floyd want to waste his time filling his resume with yet another bum in Margarito? He's already beaten much better people.
          First of all, you are ******ed if you think that didnt make sense. You admitted that Floyd cherry picked Gatti and Baldomir, face the facts.

          Second, you are turning this into floyd vs margarito instead of should floyd have fought margarito? Floyd being better than margarito is irrelevant, Oscar shouldnt have fought half the ppl on his resume by that inane logic because he is better than Vargas, Mosley, Mayweather, etc. You fight the best to be the best, margarito was ranked #1.

          Comment

          • Dorian
            The P4P King
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Nov 2005
            • 26501
            • 1,652
            • 2,198
            • 42,879

            #35
            do you live under a rock? Margarito is the best fighter EVER

            ALI WHO??

            Comment

            • 2501
              upinurgirlsguts
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Oct 2007
              • 20211
              • 902
              • 49
              • 28,237

              #36
              Originally posted by sonofisis
              You're calling me an idiot for nothing. I asked you a simple question and that was "why did you post their current records, post Floyd Mayweather as if it reflects anything? The insults only allude to your limited vocabulary and immaturity.
              you clearly said that beating a bum with 4 losses would prove nothing. i posted records of 2 fighters who had more than 4 losses at the time Floyd fought them. you can dance around that all you want, ignore and take it out of context all you want, you just make yourself seem less of a boxing fan, and more of a groupie fanatic.

              Originally posted by c'monmang'
              Son and Ray Lewis ARE THE BIGGEST CLOWNS in here.

              Comment

              • sonofisis
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jun 2005
                • 3241
                • 233
                • 78
                • 9,871

                #37
                Originally posted by pride
                because the real boxing fans know margarito is not a bum..
                Contrary, all us non-mexicans and impartial fans with no particular preference see Margarito as nothing more than average, with "bum" simply being relative. I choose to use the word for its impact.

                Comment

                • BmoreBrawler
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jul 2006
                  • 4594
                  • 130
                  • 315
                  • 11,672

                  #38
                  Originally posted by sonofisis
                  Contrary, all us non-mexicans and impartial fans with no particular preference see Margarito as nothing more than average, with "bum" simply being relative. I choose to use the word for its impact.

                  Comment

                  • sonofisis
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jun 2005
                    • 3241
                    • 233
                    • 78
                    • 9,871

                    #39
                    Originally posted by 2501
                    you clearly said that beating a bum with 4 losses would prove nothing. i posted records of 2 fighters who had more than 4 losses.
                    One of them has a better resume than Marg and another had the lineal title, including a better resume than Marg, hence they've at least proven themselves to an extent. Margarito has only proven that he has a ****ty promoter (at least now) who can't get him decent fights and when he does, he (Marg) gets embarrassed and exposed.

                    Point being that you posted their current records, which is ****** as ****. You're obviously biased and are either incompetent and don't understand, or like to play real dirty.

                    Originally posted by BmoreBrawler
                    Why communicate in sign language? You ******ed or something? If you are, my bad.
                    Last edited by sonofisis; 12-20-2007, 01:12 PM.

                    Comment

                    • pride
                      Banned
                      Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                      • Dec 2007
                      • 97
                      • 6
                      • 0
                      • 137

                      #40
                      Originally posted by sonofisis
                      Contrary, all us non-mexicans and impartial fans with no particular preference see Margarito as nothing more than average, with "bum" simply being relative. I choose to use the word for its impact.
                      margarito is a top 20 p4p fighters. hes no bum. if hes a bum why not take $8 million to fight him??

                      would you turn down even $1 million to fight a man who you know you would beat easy???

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP