The top welters don't really want to fight him. It is VERY EASY to talk behind a mic, but under those lights, its a WHOLE DIFFERENT STORY! I think a Testimony from Hatton will wake these "top welters" out of la-la land!!!
Mayweather ain't no walk in the park like the "MAY-HATERS" movement make him seem!
a testimony from a JW? great Floyd, great concept ..
I never heard Shane complain not once about the decision. Plus, what would a rematch prove? Once Cotto beats him again, guys like you will only claim that Cotto beat an "old" Shane. So what's the point?
Don't play the guys like you game with me man. The fight was close, very close. So close that it could have gone either way in the end.
Cotto won that fight and it was close so let them fight again just like Floyd did.
no but he has had atleast FOUR fights in that division and just BEAT SSM..in that division
And Hatton fought 2, stop nit picking. Both fought the vast majority of their fights below the WW limit and so did Floyd, and Cotto is bigger than both.
Don't play the guys like you game with me man. The fight was close, very close. So close that it could have gone either way in the end.
Cotto won that fight and it was close so let them fight again just like Floyd did.
Yes it was close, but the majority of the boxing world saw it as a win for Cotto. It wasnt a controversial decision like the first Floyd/Castillo fight. Like i said, Shane isnt even complaining.......so why are u?
And Hatton fought 2, stop nit picking. Both fought the vast majority of their fights below the WW limit and so did Floyd, and Cotto is bigger than both.
Isnt that boy in your avatar a little tooo big to be getting breast-fed?
no but he has had atleast FOUR fights in that division and just BEAT SSM..in that division
And Hatton beat Luis Collazo, making him a former welterweight titlist.
Everyone on this forum said that his fight with Collazo was a fluke because he had the flu or something, so... I don't understand what the difference is really.
Yes it was close, but the majority of the boxing world saw it as a win for Cotto. It wasnt a controversial decision like the first Floyd/Castillo fight. Like i said, Shane isnt even complaining.......so why are u?
yeap, had it's close MOMENTS, but was a clear cut vic for Cotto, not a split D by the judges or any complaints from GBP or SSM..
And Hatton beat Luis Collazo, making him a former welterweight titlist.
Everyone on this forum said that his fight with Collazo was a fluke because he had the flu or something, so... I don't understand what the difference is really.
sure kid, he went back down to JW and gave up his belt...only reason he fought Floyd at 147 was because Floyd didnt want to go back to 140.
Tweet
Comment