The KO.. (Mayweather-Hatton)

[Weebler I]

The fact is that the check hook had him on ***** street, and after that punch, it was clearly evident that Floyd was going to stop Hatton in that round.

After the event, not necessarily the punch. The turnbuckle means a double hit on two different places, very disorientating. I'm not so sure Hatton couldn't have hung on through the round. But we'll never know.

[Easy-E]

After the event, not necessarily the punch. The turnbuckle means a double hit on two different places, very disorientating. I'm not so sure Hatton couldn't have hung on through the round. But we'll never know.

That left hook had Hatton so disoriented, he actully fell headfirst into a turnbuckle.
Thats all that needs to be said.

[Sweet Pete]

Fact: Hatton was TKO'd. Not KO'd.
Fact: It was not the check hook that ended the fight. If that were the case, the fight would've came to a halt right there.

It was the beginning of the end, no question about it. Without that punch, it wouldn't have happened like it did. He hurt him bad and dropped him, and then finished him off when he got back up. Simple.

[Easy-E]

It was the beginning of the end, no question about it. Without that punch, it wouldn't have happened like it did. He hurt him bad and dropped him, and then finished him off when he got back up. Simple.

Like I said.
Theres no debate.

[Welter_Skelter]

The fact is that the check hook had him on ***** street, and after that punch, it was clearly evident that Floyd was going to stop Hatton in that round.
Fernando Vargas got up after getting rocked my Mosley's left hook and it was clear he was finished.
This kind of think happens all the time, a fighter lands a huge punch, puts their opponent down and on ***** street, and then they get up and get finished off shorty after.
Have you never watched boxing?

If it's fact.. why are people dis*****g it.. right now????

facts cannot be disputed.. only opinions can.. can you see the difference..???

[Easy-E]

If it's fact.. why are people dis*****g it.. right now????

facts acnnot be disputed.. only opinions can.. can you see the difference..???

Simple,
Because they are ******.

[Jim Jeffries]

If prime George Foreman hits you squarely on the jaw, and you're stumbling around barely knowing where you are, and I come along and knock you out, who deserves credit for the knockout, me or George? I would think George does.

[Easy-E]

If prime George Foreman hits you squarely on the jaw, and you're stumbling around barely knowing where you are, and I come along and knock you out, who deserves credit for the knockout, me or George? I would think George does.

Right, the punch that ends the fight is not necessarily always the punch that leads to the knockout.

[Welter_Skelter]

[B]

Simple,
Because they are ******.

They are ******.. becasue they dont share your opinion????

Wow.. Good argument...

This thread is about facts .. not opinions.. how many times do I have to say that?? how many time do I have ask you why you keep using your opinion against facts...???
That's like bringing a Supersoaker to a Gun Fight...

[Easy-E]

They are ******.. becasue they dont share your opinion????

Wow.. Good argument...

This thread is about facts .. not opinions.. how many times do I have to say that?? how many time do I have ask you why you keep using your opinion against facts...???
That's like bringing a Supersoaker to a Gun Fight...

No, they are ****** because they are denying fact.
Its not opinion at all, its absolutly clear what happened.