Joe Calzaghe Would Like Winky Wright at 168
Collapse
-
-
he would have a better chance if he came in on fight night around 160 or less. when he fought hopkins and he was around 170, he looked blown up and slow. i really hated that fight. lolComment
-
Nope i just for-see it Joe has never fought anybody with the Jab and defense Winky has... Word is Winky has took a few pages from Hopkins book and if this fight happens look for Winky to be rugged inside and flawless with the Jab outside.. I ultimately see if it HAPPENS Winky landing something or somethings that will make the REF halt and stop the fight!Comment
-
Easy fight for Wright IMO.Nope i just for-see it Joe has never fought anybody with the Jab and defense Winky has... Word is Winky has took a few pages from Hopkins book and if this fight happens look for Winky to be rugged inside and flawless with the Jab outside.. I ultimately see if it HAPPENS Winky landing something or somethings that will make the REF halt and stop the fight!Comment
-
fixed it for you.Yes he's a feather fisted fighter/
Winky will make this look easy.
The step up in comp from Eubank,Reid, Kessler, Lacy to Winky will be HUGE.
Winky has fought Taylor (draw), Hopkins (lost decisively), Tito(blown up welterweight), Mosley (blown up lightweight) twice, Vargas (lost), Harry Simon (lost), Vasquez (lost)......Winky will not be fazed.Last edited by Jim Jeffries; 12-04-2007, 10:52 AM.Comment
-
damn 2 of my favorites............boxing wise MY favorite 2 fighters right now.....calz will probably win but ill root for the winkster...Comment
-
I can't see winky winning this one. He's too small too slow and too defensive. Winky is a great fighter but for the above reasons he won't win this fight.Comment
-
You know this guy has fought the best of the best in there respective PRIMES including HOPKINS, despite him not being in his YOUNG PRIME he is fighting just as good now then, then! JOE hasnt seen the level of comp Winky has, Winky is a RUGGED vet while JOE is a PAMPERED vet!Last edited by MoneyINC; 12-04-2007, 10:52 AM.Comment
Comment