Is Manny Pacquiao REALLY the "Mexican Assasin"?

[VERDUGO]

Yes he is!
Manny beat the **** out every ****in. Mexican he faced.
And no Mexican has even knock down PAC! LOL

Just watch this!

[kasangga]

Yes he is!
Manny beat the **** out every ****in. Mexican he faced.
And no Mexican has even knock down PAC! LOL

Just watch this!

Yeah!!!

But may I suggest: "Mexicans' Nightmare"

It's the dream of all Pac haters to see him KO'd by a Mexican,
but since Pac messed up ALL Mexican boxers he faced,
and has NEVER been even KD by any Mexican,
these haters keep on dreaming.

Until that day comes, these poor guys never have a good night's sleep!!!

[Sugar_ITA]

as·sas·sin

1. a murderer, esp. one who kills a politically prominent person for fanatical or monetary reasons.

A murderer. Of course, when calling Pac The Mexican "Assassin", its done metaphorically. But this is implying that Manny has completely dominated and destroyed his iconic Mexican opposition. But upon further inspection, has he really?

Pac's first encounter with a Mexican legend, MAB, did result in a complete domination and all out embarrassment of the legend, but his next fight, he failed to replicate the same kind of performance against JMM, who at the time, wasn't proven to be on the same level of MAB. Pac dropped him 3 times in the first round only to allow JMM to outbox/class Pac up till the end of the fight. Whether Pac won that or not is irrelevant because he did not destroy Marquez. Thats not very "assasin" like. Then the next legend to take a shot at Pac, Erik Morales, LEGITIMATELY defeats Pacquiao in a fight where Erik went toe to toe with the Pacster. Of course, Pac's later rendezvous with both Morales and Barrera resulted in complete annihilation of them, but for anyone to not recognize that these war ravaged fighters were already quite past their prime would be just...well, groupie-esque for Pac.

He has ended Morales and Barrera. This is the truth.
JMM? yes, he has been outboxed by one of the best boxer in the world today. We have to wait March 15 to have a response but he deserves his name.

[ROSS CALIFORNIA]

Yeah, he beat two of the biggest names in boxing from Mexico. But I don't think the name "Mexican assassin" is a good title to put on the guy.

[FUMIN 88]

he beat 2 old legends that looks good on any resume but they wernt prime pac gets a little to much credit for these wins in my opinion

[johnco]

old legend my ass ..."peeleft:
mab was pound per pound number 2 when he was whooped
and em was still part of the pound per pound

your just a sorry ass loser

by the way my first time to post

[Pugilistic™]

marquez is gonna beat him

[-Hyperion-]

honestly the only fights that should count are the first 3 fights vs mexican guys who were in his level and hes 1-1-1 againts them

he beat a very good version of MAB easily
he got a controversial draw against Marquez(wich most people witha brain scored 114-111 for JMM)
And he got his ass whopped by a post prime Morales coming form a loss 116-112 the closest....


since then, he's beat a blown up larios and couldnt KO him, an untested solis and struggled, a drained morales coming from a loss to zahir raheem and struggled, a shot and drained morales in a totally unnecessary fight because morales had 3 losses in his last 4 fights...and a rematch with MAB even though he had already destroyed a better version aof him and looked like **** beating this older version.....


so no, pac is overhyped...

[-Hyperion-]

Pacquiao doesn't get enough credit for dominating Barrera, he had not been beaten since 2000 and was on an excellent winning streak beating the likes of Tapia, Morales, Hamed, Kelley.

Morales fight was a gift.......and he didnt look hot at all vs tapia...

[SnoopySmurf]

honestly the only fights that should count are the first 3 fights vs mexican guys who were in his level and hes 1-1-1 againts them

he beat a very good version of MAB easily
he got a controversial draw against Marquez(wich most people witha brain scored 114-111 for JMM)
And he got his ass whopped by a post prime Morales coming form a loss 116-112 the closest....


since then, he's beat a blown up larios and couldnt KO him, an untested solis and struggled, a drained morales coming from a loss to zahir raheem and struggled, a shot and drained morales in a totally unnecessary fight because morales had 3 losses in his last 4 fights...and a rematch with MAB even though he had already destroyed a better version aof him and looked like **** beating this older version.....


so no, pac is overhyped...

I wouldn't say over-hyped. Seriously, there was no other named fighter at the time besides those you mentioned. Marquez had already priced himself out of a rematch with Pac AND Morales! Larios is no slouch, my friend. He's got the reach and height advantage on Pac. He KOd Solis who's an unorthodoxed fighter.

When Morales lost to Zahir, people here complained that he was too small for 135. Then when he went back to 130, he was weight drained and old.

Pac can't win most of you guys over...but he'll just continue to win. So he's now overhyped by the doubters. I think...actually, I KNOW people will say that Marquez is washed up should he lose to Pac in a rematch.

Am I right? And the over hype label will continue.