Just watched the collazo fight.

[FloydNO1KO]

******!!!!!

[boxing_pundit85]

not to mention the trouble PBF had against Castillo then for Castillo later to be KO'd by Hatton later on. So by threadstarter's logic, PBF cant be great either.

Pbf was injured when training for that fight, which should have been obvious because he completely dominated him healthy.

[2120]

he got knocked down by a b+ fighter, i dont care if it was scored or not

nothing wrong with getting dropped by a b+ fighter

collazo is a slick south paw that fights very well on the inside throwing alot of combination
hes a good fighter in a very deep division

[squealpiggy]

umm obviously if you get hit by a punch and try to hold to stay on your feet and your opponent does not let you hold and you go down it is a knockdown. is there a rule that your opponent has to hold you up after he nails you with a good shot. you must not know boxing too well.

Hatton was on his feet and only fell because Collazo pushed him down. If Collazo didn't PUSH him then he wouldn't have ended up on the canvas. Hence it was correctly ruled no knockdown.

You must not know boxing too well.

PS

[IMG]http://i122.***********.com/albums/o267/realpiggy/mayweatherjudah.gif[/IMG]

That's a legit knockdown that wasn't called.

Good post, Thread Stealer.

[Dynamite Kid]

no Hatton looked like the worst champion in history against Collazo/Urango

club fighter objective Lmfao

[Thread Stealer]

hatton looked like absolute **** in that fight, like a club fighter, are you trying to say that any of the fighters you mentioned looked that bad in those fights, no ****ing way.

well i've never seen robinson vs. tiger jones, but i can assure you when the greatest fighter of all-time loses to a journeyman like tiger jones, he must've looked bad.

larry holmes looked bad against the 19-8 mike weaver.

erik morales looked bad when he was arguably losing to guty espadas and losing to zahir raheem. you think morales looked good when losing to raheem?

would you like me to go on with more examples of great fighters who had off-nights to shut down your ****** claim of "great fighters can't have off nights unless they're injured"?

Because I can go on and on if you'd like.

[boxing_pundit85]

not to mention the trouble PBF had against Castillo then for Castillo later to be KO'd by Hatton later on. So by threadstarter's logic, PBF cant be great either.

im saying that when you havent fought a high level of competition and in one of your few fights against top competition you look horrible, you shouldnt be in the pfp top ten.

[squealpiggy]

im saying that when you havent fought a high level of competition and in one of your few fights against top competition you look horrible, you shouldnt be in the pfp top ten.

So Collazo is top competition? Hooray! Luis will be flattered.

[boxing_pundit85]

well i've never seen robinson vs. tiger jones, but i can assure you when the greatest fighter of all-time loses to a journeyman like tiger jones, he must've looked bad.

larry holmes looked bad against the 19-8 mike weaver.

erik morales looked bad when he was arguably losing to guty espadas and losing to zahir raheem. you think morales looked good when losing to raheem?

would you like me to go on with more examples of great fighters who had off-nights to shut down your ****** claim of "great fighters can't have off nights unless they're injured"?

Because I can go on and on if you'd like.

ok say you are right, any fighter can fight like **** on any given night, hatton hasnt done enough for us to judge if he really just had a bad night, because he has beaten up on a bunch of bums, and has maybe 3 good wins. not trying to flame but that is just a ****ing fact.

[Mr. Ryan]

My favorite thing about the forums is watching fans of opposing fighters flame and try to discredit each other. It's quite humorizing.