The answer to this thread is a formality. but it's not a dumb thread. When you consider some posters on here think beating Byrd, Brock and Brewster allude to some sort of greatness. Bollocks about Wlad surpassing Lewis based on a few good performances is quite a popular opinion by some.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Better resume Wlad or Lewis
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by GazinManchester View Postdumbest thread today tbh
But come on people you need to vote it's too close to call at the moment and your 1 vote could make all the difference.
Votes so far:-
Wladimir Klitchko = 1 vote
Lennox Lewis = 58 votes
Comment
-
Originally posted by WLAD OWNS View PostI didn't vote for Wlad, that was Revs.
Lewis obviously has the better resume, this is one of the ******est threads of all time.Originally posted by RAESAAD View PostThis is laughable......But at least 53 out of 54 people who voted got the answer right.Originally posted by hurricane72 View PostNot doing too bad is it Gaz for a dumb thread.
But come on people you need to vote it's too close to call at the moment and your 1 vote could make all the difference.
Votes so far:-
Wladimir Klitchko = 1 vote
Lennox Lewis = 58 votes
Comment
-
Originally posted by hurricane72 View PostI know I started this obvious thread to prove to the Wlademites that were arguing with me last night.
I said that Wlad will not be considered as great as Lewis because of the competition fought and who's available left to fight. Because the division is in such a poor state and I can't see anyone that can give him the megafights to prove how great he is. But they would not have it and stated Lewis fought no-one but a shot Tyson and faded Holyfield. Even disregarding them 2 fighters his resume is still far superior and difficult for Wlad to match.
It's not Wlad hating on my behalf but stating something blatantly obvious to any knowledgable boxing fan.
Comment
Comment