The answer to this thread is a formality. but it's not a dumb thread. When you consider some posters on here think beating Byrd, Brock and Brewster allude to some sort of greatness. Bollocks about Wlad surpassing Lewis based on a few good performances is quite a popular opinion by some.
Better resume Wlad or Lewis
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
lol at the 'sympathy' voteComment
-
K....I see.Lennox is an all time Great IMO and I don't think Wlad will ever be considered that.....even if he wins his next 10 fights by KO and retires....he'll never be a Lennox Lewis.....Lewis is one of the very few fighters that has defeated every man he ever fought.I know I started this obvious thread to prove to the Wlademites that were arguing with me last night.
I said that Wlad will not be considered as great as Lewis because of the competition fought and who's available left to fight. Because the division is in such a poor state and I can't see anyone that can give him the megafights to prove how great he is. But they would not have it and stated Lewis fought no-one but a shot Tyson and faded Holyfield. Even disregarding them 2 fighters his resume is still far superior and difficult for Wlad to match.
It's not Wlad hating on my behalf but stating something blatantly obvious to any knowledgable boxing fan.Comment
-
-
Comment
Comment