Floyd's opposition

[sonofisis]

No...his post just supported my whole argument. It's very clear what happened. But, you can see what you want.

The challenge to Dios was to find anything that showed Floyd wanted Tszyu when the potential fight was being promoted after Tszyu's fight with Mitchell. There was approximately a month where Tszyu was holding himself open for a fight with Floyd. (roughly Nov. 2004-Dec. 2004) That's what my article shows. In other words, there was Tszyu saying he wanted the fight that was being promoted with offers. Floyd never said a thing. Floyd ignored it and went for Gatti. Dios' article was published after the time period I'm focusing on and it proves Mayweather's intention was to fight Gatti before he fought Tszyu. To tell you the truth....if Tszyu would have beaten Hatton, I seriously doubt Floyd would have made the fight. Floyd had years to make good his alleged intention to fight Tszyu. He never made a real move. It was all talk.

You're lying again . Please post the article that demonstrates Tszyu and his promotional team reserving a set time period in order to persue a fight with Floyd..

[sonofisis]

Floyd has ducked the best fighters at 140 and 147.

Actually, the best fighters at 140 (Cotto and Hatton) ducked him, so why keep repeating this lie? He beat the best available at 147, or rather those that mattered and is the only current 147 pound champ I see coming off a championship win at 154.

[AntonTheMeh]

Actually, the best fighters at 140 (Cotto and Hatton) ducked him, so why keep repeating this lie? He beat the best available at 147, or rather those that mattered and is the only current 147 pound champ I see coming off a championship win at 154.

SHOW ME PROOF

[WLAD OWNS]

Actually, the best fighters at 140 (Cotto and Hatton) ducked him, so why keep repeating this lie? He beat the best available at 147, or rather those that mattered and is the only current 147 pound champ I see coming off a championship win at 154.

Don't get me wrong, his opposition has been pretty damn good, but he shouldn't have ducked Tszyu and Margarito. Where is the evidence that Hatton and Cotto ducked Mayweather???

[Wiley Hyena]

You're lying again . Please post the article that demonstrates Tszyu and his promotional team reserving a set time period in order to persue a fight with Floyd..

Again....just go to "Mayweather and the 5 Bums". The article I relied upon is right there.

You know, all the arguments were extensively voiced in that thread.

Trust me. Nothing you can say will change my opinion that Floyd dodged Tszyu. The only thing that will sway my opinion on this is if you can show me anything where Floyd expressed his interest to take the fight with Tszyu that was laid on the table as of December 2004. You won't find it, because Floyd's intentions to take Gatti instead, have been specifically published......see the article above.

If anybody is "lying" it's you. Now run along and play, moron.

[Wiley Hyena]

Don't get me wrong, his opposition has been pretty damn good, but he shouldn't have ducked Tszyu and Margarito. Where is the evidence that Hatton and Cotto ducked Mayweather???

What makes it worse is that Floyd has already negated the idea of fighting Cotto (if he makes it by Hatton). That bull**** Arum excuse is just that....bull****.

Floyd has a chance to redeem himself. He's still got plenty of career left to suck it up and take on the best. I have always stated that I will give him credit if he will only do it.

[sonofisis]

SHOW ME PROOF

Mayweather Jr. Challenges Tszyu, De La Hoya and Cotto

[NAPO]

did sonofonis just said that cotto ducked maywheather please somebody answer so i could laugh.

[NAPO]

Mayweather Jr. Challenges Tszyu, De La Hoya and Cotto

i don't see no challenge that was the writer who wrote that U LIAR!!!!!

[sonofisis]

Again....just go to "Mayweather and the 5 Bums". The article I relied upon is right there.

You know, all the arguments were extensively voiced in that thread.

Trust me. Nothing you can say will change my opinion that Floyd dodged Tszyu.

I don't want to change your opinion, heavens please. Only making sure that your claims are supported and challenged given that many gullible guests may be viewing this thread. As long as they see that you have no sources to present I think if they're logical, they'd be able to see right through all of your bluffing, which is why you can't support any of your claims yet are simply satisfied in making them.