Eubank says he was holding Calzaghe up!
Collapse
-
-
So the slower, older Eubank who gave a good account of himself against Joe would have had little to no advantage if Chris was younger and faster and had the proper time to train?
I'm going to disagree with you here.Comment
-
of coarse he would have had a better adavantage if he were younger i never said any different
what im saying is a prime Eubank would'nt have beaten Calzaghe eitherComment
-
Calzaghe wasn't a world champion. He was a rookie, and a pretty raw one at that. Both fighters came through that fight with a whole lot of credit for different reasons, but both deservedly so.Eubank had 2 weeks notice to fight Joe. Can anyone here lose enough weight and be in shape to fight a world champion in 2 weeks?
Joe won the fight before the contract was signed.
This fight may have been what finally got Chris the respect he long wanted from Britain.
Sadly, in the UK people prefer glorious failure to genuine achievement. That is why Eubank was more popular after his defeats to Calzaghe and Thompson and also why Lewis Hamilton will win Sports Personality of the Year and neither Calzaghe nor Hatton (if he beats Mayweather) will.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
i agree people who claim Eubank was passed it are a joke he was beaten fair & square by a figher who was completing 12 rounds for the first time ever in his career & a fighter who was no where near as good as he is todayComment
-
Man even Eubank himself said he had no excuses for being beaten by Calzaghe & that Joe beat him fair & sqaure read his autobiographyComment
-
So the little old rookie beat the king of the smw ring at the time, wtf he beat him and would beat him again and again, Eubank was a very tough boxer, but the rookie beat him ,says it all, leave the excuses under the history book.Comment
Comment