Who else thinks Guzman would make PAC look silly?

[JoartCC]

You will only own yourself.

what ever you say is is correct. forget what i think, you are always right. you should become president one day! (sarcasim)[/QUOTE]
Good.

Aint you the master of the obvious.

And you yapping like Guzman is some **** better brain up.

Morales and Barrera is in a far different league than what Guzman is now. It is a complete insult to boxing that you even have the gall to compare them.

[BennyST]

They said that about Ledwaba, Barrera, Morales, etc. They even said that about Solis.

Who the hell ever said that about Solis? Solis was just a tune up for Pac but they had to find a tune up that looked good so they found a guy (had to be another Mexican as well) with no losses. Everyone knew Pac was gonna win that one easy and if anyone said Pac has to watch out then they were a few pennies short of a pound.

They never even said that about Morales either. Pac had blasted out Barrera and got the D with Marquez so they knew what he was bringing. Morales had been on the slide and losing and a lot of people wrote him off. He proved that he still had one fight left in him and beat Pac convincingly in their first fight.

[slicksouthpaw16]

what ever you say is is correct. forget what i think, you are always right. you should become president one day! (sarcasim)

Good.

Aint you the master of the obvious.

And you yapping like Guzman is some **** better brain up.
Morales and Barrera is in a far different league than what Guzman is now. It is a complete insult to boxing that you even have the gall to compare them.[/QUOTE]

Guzman would beat, PAC, Morales, and Barrera IMO

[slicksouthpaw16]

what ever you say is is correct. forget what i think, you are always right. you should become president one day! (sarcasim)

Good.

Aint you the master of the obvious.

And you yapping like Guzman is some **** better brain up.

Morales and Barrera is in a far different league than what Guzman is now. It is a complete insult to boxing that you even have the gall to compare them.[/QUOTE]

[vBTube]rNXDe00MXMo[/vBTube]

[slicksouthpaw16]

Morales and Barrera is in a far different league than what Guzman is now. It is a complete insult to boxing that you even have the gall to compare them.

hey booty licker, watch this
[vBTube]rNXDe00MXMo[/vBTube]

[JoartCC]

hey booty licker, watch this
[vBTube]rNXDe00MXMo[/vBTube]

Ha?

Guzman better than Barrera and Morales?

Dude are you on crack or something?

Let me repeat ok so that you won't be dumbfounded. If you're not already a dumb and dumber case.

You said

"Guzman would beat Pac, Barrera and Morales".

You really made my day dude. Keep it up.

[SpeedKillz]

Good.

Aint you the master of the obvious.

And you yapping like Guzman is some **** better brain up.
Morales and Barrera is in a far different league than what Guzman is now. It is a complete insult to boxing that you even have the gall to compare them.

Guzman would beat, PAC, Morales, and Barrera IMO[/quote]

at this stage, guzman beats barrerra and morales, in their primes, no way imo.

as far as pac, i think he gives him alot of trouble and fits, but if i bet on it, i would bet on pac.

[EeZz]

where your other thread slick? first, respond to it first then create another thread k? i already told you there, why PAC wont get beat by Guzman and you cant even counter it.

[EeZz]

what other thread? just tell me the other thread and i'll get over there and own you.

this thread slick
http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...=148503&page=3

[slicksouthpaw16]

this thread slick
http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...=148503&page=3

but i already replied to everything you said in that thread.