Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who else thinks Guzman would make PAC look silly?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by RunW/Knives View Post
    Pacquiao has never fought anyone like Guzman before, ever.
    What are you guys arguing with me about. If you look at my first post or first two posts on this thread, I said, I'd favor Guzman over PAC.

    Guzman may very well win with ease against PAC. But you best believe, PAC as y'all have witnessed, ain't the one to give up. And all PAC needs is one punch to get things rollin'! It may or may never come against a slickster like Guzwoman. PAC is a speedster himself, maybe not on the level of Guzman, but PAC's gonna land some, and Guzwoman better pray it ain't the one that detonated on MAB's, JMM's, and EM's faces, we all know what type of chins all those three legends had!

    Its funny, the three greatest chins that the lower weights may have ever seen came crackin' under PAC's fists(now is that a coincidence or is it that PAC's fist are legit), he may not have the 1ko power that y'all love to criticize PAC for, but he sure puts a hurtin' on all y'alls fighter(lol).
    Last edited by We want Floyd; 11-18-2007, 04:16 PM.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Kball15 View Post
      I completely disagree.

      I think its a very even fight. Pacquiao is easily one of the best fighters in the world when he is going forward.

      Going backwards and its a different story, but Guzman wont even try making PAC go backwards. Its not his game.

      Id put my money on PAC, but Guzmans speed could give pac trouble.
      thats all you can say? its not Guzman game not to move PAC backward? if you can't give detail about how PAC would win, then you don't really believe what you just said.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by MASGAGOMEXI View Post
        What are you guys arguing with me about. If you look at my first post or first two posts on this thread, I said, I'd favor Guzman over PAC.

        Guzman may very well win with ease against PAC. But you best believe, PAC as y'all have witnessed, ain't the one to give up. And all PAC needs is one punch to get things rollin'! It may or may never come against a slickster like Guzwoman. PAC is a speedster himself, maybe not on the level of Guzman, but PAC's gonna land some, and Guzwoman better pray it ain't the one that detonated on MAB's, JMM's, and EM's faces, we all know what type of chins all those three legends had!

        Its funny, the three greatest chins that the lower weights may have ever seen came crackin' under PAC's fists(now is that a coincidence or is it that PAC's fist are legit), he may not have the 1ko power that y'all love to criticize PAC for, but he sure puts a hurtin' on all y'alls fighter(lol).
        If PAC can land on some of the best technicians the sport has seen, why is it not possible to land on Guzwoman. Sure, Guzwoman arguably is the slickest fighter PAC may face(jmm might have something to say about this), but PAC's handspeed is world-class in its own right. Runny says, PAC ain't never seen a fighter w/ Guzman's athletic ability. Has Guzwoman faced a fighter with PAC's hand and footspeed and a southpaw to boot?!

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by MASGAGOMEXI View Post
          If PAC can land on some of the best technicians the sport has seen, why is it not possible to land on Guzwoman. Sure, Guzwoman arguably is the slickest fighter PAC may face(jmm might have something to say about this), but PAC's handspeed is world-class in its own right. Runny says, PAC ain't never seen a fighter w/ Guzman's athletic ability. Has Guzwoman faced a fighter with PAC's hand and footspeed and a southpaw to boot?!
          Don't matter. what matters is the fact that PAC is one dimensional and Guzman is a slick boxer/counter puncher that has all the tools. and Marquez don't even come close to being as slick as Guzman. its not even a comparison are you crazy???? Marquez is not really slick. hes just a good counter puncher. do you see him roll his shoulder, hold on to the ropes while dodging punches, or stand in your face while smiling and making you miss? NO! but Guzman does all of that. thats called being slick.

          Comment


          • #35
            Guzman is another favorite of mine, but nobody's beating Pac at SuperFeather weight although Marquez and Guzman provide the greatest threat

            Comment


            • #36
              I think he could beat Pac but he would have to be on his game 100% to beat him.....

              Comment


              • #37
                Guzman may make pac look silly at times, but I for one think that he won't be able to keep up with Manny's blistering pace...I can picture Guzman getting caught somewhere in the mid or 2nd half of the fight...Guzman would need to step up his stamina game..

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by slicksouthpaw16 View Post
                  thats all you can say? its not Guzman game not to move PAC backward? if you can't give detail about how PAC would win, then you don't really believe what you just said.
                  that doesnt even make any sense. Of coarse i believe it.

                  Neither guy has that "Money Punch" that would be super effective against their opponent.

                  But i cant see Guzman getting past that straight left hand enough to do any damage.

                  I consider Juan Manuel Marquez as a much better fighter all around then Guzman, cause he boxes and he brawls. He lets his hands go when he needs to.

                  Guzman never lets his hands go so he's not going to be as effective. He wont be able to potshot Pacquiao because Pacquiao is always moving, he's bobbing around on the outside, bobbing and weaving, or he's throwing punches.

                  Guzman would need to let his hands go a lot to win

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Guzman is a big man for his weight class, and has a slick defense. But he's still hittable and would be especially for Pac.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Kball15 View Post
                      that doesnt even make any sense. Of coarse i believe it.

                      Neither guy has that "Money Punch" that would be super effective against their opponent.

                      But i cant see Guzman getting past that straight left hand enough to do any damage.

                      I consider Juan Manuel Marquez as a much better fighter all around then Guzman, cause he boxes and he brawls. He lets his hands go when he needs to.

                      Guzman never lets his hands go so he's not going to be as effective. He wont be able to potshot Pacquiao because Pacquiao is always moving, he's bobbing around on the outside, bobbing and weaving, or he's throwing punches.

                      Guzman would need to let his hands go a lot to win

                      wrong.. at times guzman brawls.. esp in the begininng to see how well he can take the other guys punch..
                      sayin he never lets his hands go is ******ed.. see the barios fight my friend.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP