Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pac over-rated???

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pac over-rated???

    first things first im a pac fan and i enjoy watching him fight. However I cant help but think he gets a little too much credit for his wins over morales and barera. Whilst he impressively beat them both twice, we can all agree they were out their primes and not the same fighters we saw in morales v barera 1. Pac was also schooled by marquez quite comfortably in their first fight. Since being with roach his skills have undoubtedly improved and he has become a much more rounded fighter. I look forward to the rematch with marquez as i expect a very exciting fight, but ultimately a fight which marquez wins by decision. If Pac decides to move up to lightweight and fight baby bull i think he loses another decision as well and possibly gets stopped. I have to laugh when people suggest pac is p4p number one as well. Whilst im no fan of floyd its obvious that a p4p fight between these guys would end in a one sided beating, pac is far too crude for a guy like floyd. Before everyone starts hating on me i do think pac is a top 10 p4p guy and is an exciting fighter, i just dont like it when people act like he's an unbeatable superstar for beating up on faded greats. thoughts??

  • #2
    i think that he does get a lot of attention. however i have a feeling that he is capable of beating anoyne at 130. it's just that i guess its politics and money.

    if boxing ahd elagues and people ahd to fight each other every 3 mnoths then it would show pacman as the best.

    there are too many pacman nuthuggers around, but he is good. when he first came he was kinda unknown i think. he ahs beaten some good contenders aswell. now it's time for him to beat prime contenders to shwo his dominance.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by DURAN_IS_GOD View Post
      first things first im a pac fan and i enjoy watching him fight. However I cant help but think he gets a little too much credit for his wins over morales and barera. Whilst he impressively beat them both twice, we can all agree they were out their primes and not the same fighters we saw in morales v barera 1. Pac was also schooled by marquez quite comfortably in their first fight. Since being with roach his skills have undoubtedly improved and he has become a much more rounded fighter. I look forward to the rematch with marquez as i expect a very exciting fight, but ultimately a fight which marquez wins by decision. If Pac decides to move up to lightweight and fight baby bull i think he loses another decision as well and possibly gets stopped. I have to laugh when people suggest pac is p4p number one as well. Whilst im no fan of floyd its obvious that a p4p fight between these guys would end in a one sided beating, pac is far too crude for a guy like floyd. Before everyone starts hating on me i do think pac is a top 10 p4p guy and is an exciting fighter, i just dont like it when people act like he's an unbeatable superstar for beating up on faded greats. thoughts??
      i agree 100%

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Unseen View Post
        i think that he does get a lot of attention. however i have a feeling that he is capable of beating anoyne at 130. it's just that i guess its politics and money.

        if boxing ahd elagues and people ahd to fight each other every 3 mnoths then it would show pacman as the best.

        there are too many pacman nuthuggers around, but he is good. when he first came he was kinda unknown i think. he ahs beaten some good contenders aswell. now it's time for him to beat prime contenders to shwo his dominance.
        yeah possibly, i think marquez and maybe guzman beat him at 130 but obviously we will have to wait until after the soto fight to know more. i think pac is very exciting and good for boxing i just want him to fight some prime fighters

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by DURAN_IS_GOD View Post
          first things first im a pac fan and i enjoy watching him fight. However I cant help but think he gets a little too much credit for his wins over morales and barera. Whilst he impressively beat them both twice, we can all agree they were out their primes and not the same fighters we saw in morales v barera 1. Pac was also schooled by marquez quite comfortably in their first fight. Since being with roach his skills have undoubtedly improved and he has become a much more rounded fighter. I look forward to the rematch with marquez as i expect a very exciting fight, but ultimately a fight which marquez wins by decision. If Pac decides to move up to lightweight and fight baby bull i think he loses another decision as well and possibly gets stopped. I have to laugh when people suggest pac is p4p number one as well. Whilst im no fan of floyd its obvious that a p4p fight between these guys would end in a one sided beating, pac is far too crude for a guy like floyd. Before everyone starts hating on me i do think pac is a top 10 p4p guy and is an exciting fighter, i just dont like it when people act like he's an unbeatable superstar for beating up on faded greats. thoughts??
          I AGREE 100 PERCENT.........I ALSO BELIVE MARQUEZ IS GOING TO BEAT THAT ASS.........BADLY!!!!.I JUST HAVE THIS FEELING!!

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by gixxer View Post
            I AGREE 100 PERCENT.........I ALSO BELIVE MARQUEZ IS GOING TO BEAT THAT ASS.........BADLY!!!!.I JUST HAVE THIS FEELING!!
            well take the first 2 rounds out of the equation in their first fight and its a lop sided decision win for marquez. i can only assume he will learn from the first fight and respect pacs power!

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by DURAN_IS_GOD View Post
              first things first im a pac fan and i enjoy watching him fight. However I cant help but think he gets a little too much credit for his wins over morales and barera. Whilst he impressively beat them both twice, we can all agree they were out their primes and not the same fighters we saw in morales v barera 1. Pac was also schooled by marquez quite comfortably in their first fight. Since being with roach his skills have undoubtedly improved and he has become a much more rounded fighter. I look forward to the rematch with marquez as i expect a very exciting fight, but ultimately a fight which marquez wins by decision. If Pac decides to move up to lightweight and fight baby bull i think he loses another decision as well and possibly gets stopped. I have to laugh when people suggest pac is p4p number one as well. Whilst im no fan of floyd its obvious that a p4p fight between these guys would end in a one sided beating, pac is far too crude for a guy like floyd. Before everyone starts hating on me i do think pac is a top 10 p4p guy and is an exciting fighter, i just dont like it when people act like he's an unbeatable superstar for beating up on faded greats. thoughts??
              You're a PacFan, but he only beat shot fighters? Try to be a little more subtle you feking liar.

              Comment


              • #8
                He is the Mexterminator.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by deevel79 View Post
                  He is the Mexterminator.
                  Or Tex-Mex for short.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    pac man loses if he fights marquez or juan diaz next. finally exposed!

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP