Yes boxing is a sport.
Entertainment as a term is not ambiguous. It has been scientifically proven that violence witnessed by humans increases heart rate caused by a release of chemicals into the blood stream. Controlled violence in a fight between say, Mayorga and De La Hoya would produce entertainment (a human term for a chemically induced emotional state). A lack of violence where one fighter is backing up or running away the entire time does not cause such chemicals to be released into the blood stream. Boredom then sets in, the observer may then start to feel cheated and may even leave the arena. Does this remind you of any fighter in particular?
The vast majority of people are not entertained by Floyd Mayweather. There is a direct corrulation between the number of knockdowns, sways in momentum, back and forth in a fight and their classification as 'great' fights.
Perhaps the greatest fight of all time was the rumble in the jungle. Would this fight be considered entertaining had Ali not produced a stunning knockout of Foreman?
The way people have left Mayweather fights, or booed him whilst he was fighting shows the level of entertainment that people have experienced watching his fights.
If you ARE entertained, you are in a small minoroty.
We could perform a scientific test on a non boxing fan. They would watch a Mayweather fight such as MW vs DLH and then a real fight between Foreman and Ali. I believe if you performed this test on 100 people, the majority would say the Ali fight was more entertaining.
My opinion of Floyd fights is echoed by millions of people. Yours is echoed by the relatively small number of fanatics who will go to any length to praise him.
do you think the roman crowds would have cheered a gladiator who spend his time running away from his opponent?
Why do you think Tyson was so popular?
there is a difference between being a technical boxer and a safety first bore merchant.
Entertaining people is a side-effect of any sport, i.e; theres nothing in the rules of boxing that says "You must entertain people to win this bout." Do you know why that is? Because "entertain people" is a ambigous statement with no real definition. People are different, and they like different things. What one person likes, another person does not. I HATE when people say "Boxing is about entertaining people." What people? Entertaining how?
The vast majority of people are not entertained by Floyd Mayweather. There is a direct corrulation between the number of knockdowns, sways in momentum, back and forth in a fight and their classification as 'great' fights.
Perhaps the greatest fight of all time was the rumble in the jungle. Would this fight be considered entertaining had Ali not produced a stunning knockout of Foreman?
The way people have left Mayweather fights, or booed him whilst he was fighting shows the level of entertainment that people have experienced watching his fights.
If you ARE entertained, you are in a small minoroty.
Does that mean throw less punches more accurately or more punches less accurately? How many punches must be thrown and/or landed to qualify as entertaining, and to whom? I mean, hell, if two people are going to compete in the ring in this sport, they surely have to have these things clearly defined, or else they can't win their fights! Because after all, "Boxing is about entertaining people for all that $$$ they are paying you."
This is not rocket science. You watch and pay for boxing if you are entertained by it, if you are not, you don't. But don't think for a second that what you like extends past your own personal opinion, ever, for anything, not just boxing.
I don't watch boxing to see blood. I like and respect the gladiator-esque aspect of it for what it is,
but I do not have some primal urge to see another person get knocked unconscious. Boxing is NOT about knockouts.
If it was, then you'd be required to knock your opponent out to win. Boxing is about defeating the opponent. If you do not like seeing technical boxers...you know...BOX, then there are many, many KO artists out there. The fact that a boxer with technical skill can manage to outbox a puncher most of the time speaks volumes.
Comment