Poll: Floyd v. Castillo I...who won?

[THe TRiNiTY]

If it was a joke, you left out the punchline. The fact is that there most certainly was not a criminal investigation. Boxers appeal (contest) controversial decisions all the time, but 99% of the time nothing happens because a successful outcome is considered bad for boxing.

Actually, the punchline was very evident. Let me explain. When you were leading into the court room, with what you were saying, I mentioned court "lingo" to emphasis that Castillo had a second chance, and didn't come through. Get it?

[Wiley Hyena]

Joartcc3 quote:

"Oh... I could care less about your red K. It takes guts to speak honestly."

This is most certainly true.

[THe TRiNiTY]

I'm not talking ****. I'm telling it as it is. American boxing is upholding Fake Floyd despite being a coward, a duck, a bore and a punk.

Put him near Robinson, Hearns, SRL, any other American elite in other eras and he's dead meat.

Yet your country still upholds a coward coz basically you have nobody else.

Maybe Pavlik but too premature.

Face is dude. I'm right.

Right on the bull's eye.

Oh... I could care less about your red K. It takes guts to speak honestly.

You can speak badly about Floyd. I don't care. He's a fighter. To badmouth an entire country, is just bull****. We don't have De La Hoya? Or Mosley? Or Pavlik? AND Floyd? Or Vernon Forrest? Or Paul Williams?Or Kermit Cintron(American born)? Or Paul Malignaggi? Or Juan Diaz? I think I've made a point.

[THe TRiNiTY]

Joartcc3 quote:

"Oh... I could care less about your red K. It takes guts to speak honestly."

This is most certainly true.

It does. But, would that imply that you're endorsing his anti-American tirades? Because that's my biggest problem with this *******. And for the record, I'd be just as upset if it were anti-U.K. I just hate close-minded people, regardless. If you are insinuating that you agree with that viewpoint, I'd be able to stop taking your posts seriously, Wiley. So, please inform me.

[Wiley Hyena]

Actually, the punchline was very evident. Let me explain. When you were leading into the court room, with what you were saying, I mentioned court "lingo" to emphasis that Castillo had a second chance, and didn't come through. Get it?

Yeah, I see that. But, I got the impression you were serious because controversial decisions are contested/appealed...whatever. So, I thought it necessary to clarify what I meant by a "criminal investigation."

No problem here with your wit. It was good. But, it might have misled others as to the facts. Fair enough?

[Dirt E Gomez]

You can speak badly about Floyd. I don't care. He's a fighter. To badmouth an entire country, is just bull****. We don't have De La Hoya? Or Mosley? Or Pavlik? AND Floyd? Or Vernon Forrest? Or Paul Williams?Or Kermit Cintron(American born)? Or Paul Malignaggi? Or Juan Diaz? I think I've made a point.

Your points will fall upon deaf ears if you're trying to have a debate/discussion/intelligent discourse between Wiley and Joart.

Floyd won the fight by a round if I recall my score card. While I agree that Castillo won more rounds convincingly than Mayweather, the ones that were all closer pretty much all went to PBF. Further, the overall punch output and workrate as a whole isn't how a winner is decided.

Juding a fight is done round by round... Floyd won more rounds.

[THe TRiNiTY]

Yeah, I see that. But, I got the impression you were serious because controversial decisions are contested/appealed...whatever. So, I thought it necessary to clarify what I meant by a "criminal investigation."

No problem here with your wit. It was good. But, it might have mislead others as to the facts. Fair enough?

I'll agree with you on that. Misunderstandings happen.

[ElGranLuchador]

cmon now castillo got robbed it was all a conspiration to make mayweather the overhyped crap that he is today

[Wiley Hyena]

It does. But, would that imply that you're endorsing his anti-American tirades? Because that's my biggest problem with this *******. And for the record, I'd be just as upset if it were anti-U.K. I just hate close-minded people, regardless. If you are insinuating that you agree with that viewpoint, I'd be able to stop taking your posts seriously, Wiley. So, please inform me.

Well, I think he's confusing "our country" with those in current control of American boxing. Or, it's just a rhetoric generalization on his part. Perhaps Joartcc3 could tone it down a bit or be a little more concise with his argument.

But, outside of this mistake; Why cannot he be entitled to his opinion? It's not totally outlandish, although I would not go so far. But, there is some reason the judging in Floyd v. Castillo I was SO skewed. What is your assessment? I mean it was so bad IMO, that one could reasonably consider that the judges had been paid off. That excuse is usually a rather impotent notion, but in this fight I had some serious su****ions.

[Wiley Hyena]

Your points will fall upon deaf ears if you're trying to have a debate/discussion/intelligent discourse between Wiley and Joart.

Floyd won the fight by a round if I recall my score card. While I agree that Castillo won more rounds convincingly than Mayweather, the ones that were all closer pretty much all went to PBF. Further, the overall punch output and workrate as a whole isn't how a winner is decided.

Juding a fight is done round by round... Floyd won more rounds.

Shut the F up Dirt. You are one of the more hostile Mayweatherite twits on this board.