Strange Behaviour of Mayweather Fans

[The Troll]

You obviously have a hard time understanding how logic works. Belief does not constitute proof or refutation, but merely expresses wishful thinking.

Example of a universal negative: No planet other than earth supports life

Universal affirmative: All planets capable or supporting life, does support life

Burden of proof - The responsibility of proving a disputed charge or allegation.

Both of these assertions can be disputed; however, the affirmative claim is usually based on the 'seeing is believing' application, and conversely, that which is not seen, there is no proof for. My contention is that I've been to all of these planets in question (translation: I have followed the history of boxing for a while now), and have seen no evidence for life. This position is supported by the link that I've already provided - Greatest fighters of all time, in addition to this thread/article here , dealing with the concept of a perfect fighter. I have thus, only been able to find pockets of life on a limited number of planets, which supports my initial assertion of minimal success, in comparison to the other en****** already mentioned. If it is too hard for you to accept, I can understand, but please do not try and impose your circular reasoning on me as it won't work..

seriously, what the **** is this ****?

[sonofisis]

Alright, you had the speech of one there for a moment :P

Props for using the matter and not going on wikipedia

Well, I will say that I'm pretty well versed in critical thinking and have taken classes pertaining to it. Wikipedia is flawed in that any lame **** can make edits on it to push their agenda. That site is unnecessary in outlining the fundamental rules of argumentation..

[steptwome]

seriously, what the **** is this ****?

AAAAAAAAAHHa!

Some people take these forums WAAAAAY TOO SEROIUSLY.

[sonofisis]

effective communication is concisce and poignant, relevant to the subject matte.r .

I have no time for pseudo-intellectuals McKay. Save it for the naive. This is a semantical exercise used to undermine the validity of the points layed out above, nothing else. Your post is incoherent.

[sonofisis]

seriously, what the **** is this ****?

Something that a particular Nord I know has a hard time comprehending..

[TRUE WARRIOR]

Well, I will say that I'm pretty well versed in critical thinking and have taken classes pertaining to it. Wikipedia is flawed in that any lame **** can make edits on it to push their agenda. That site is unnecessary in outlining the fundamental rules of argumentation..

if your a mayweather fan then doubt you can think for yourself. how would anyone real intelligent boxing fan support a coward?? it makes no sense.

[The Troll]

I have no time for pseudo-intellectuals McKay. Save it for the naive. This is a semantical exercises used to undermine the validity of the points layed out above, nothing else. Your post is incoherent.

You dont have any valid points, your all semantics, paragraphs and paragraphs of them, it's just silly.

the few points you do have are constantly repeated just rephrased.

[sonofisis]

You dont have any valid points, your all semantics, paragraphs and paragraphs of them, it's just silly.

the few points you do have are constantly repeated just rephrased.

Truth by assertion.. You make no sense whatsoever and are just spewing hot air with no demonstration..

AAAAAAAAAHHa!

Some people take these forums WAAAAAY TOO SEROIUSLY.

Namely Mckay or all those who look too deeply into what is stated, instead of taking it for what it is at face value. Hopefully that isn't you..

[sonofisis]

how would anyone real intelligent boxing fan support a coward??

I've never supported you or your asinine posts. What are you talking about?

[The Troll]

and the points you have, you disguise somewhat or make vague because of the extreme black nationalist and other such content in them.