I thought it was already a given that Floyd would demolish Pac man if they ever faced off, and with a performance like last night he might just have to remain at number 2.
Pac man no1 p4p ha ha ha
Collapse
-
-
Noone said pac sucks or isn't a p4p fighter at all. They said Floyd is still retaining his spot as the number 1 pound for pound, that's it.Comment
-
-
Pacman is clearly second to Mayweather in the "pound for pound" ranking, and there's no reason to elevate him beyond Floyd after beating Barrera again, because Barrera came in an underdog AND had lost his previous fight.Comment
-
I agree,Pacman didnt look good last night,he seems to have trouble against boxers,IMO JMM performance against Barrera was better,Pacman looked like he was just doing the same thing over and over again,im a fan of his,but he didnt impress me
No way is he P4P #1,thats Floyd,a guy thats went up to jr middle,and whos fighting undefeated Ricky Hatton next,Pacman didnt look good at all against a old Barrera,it looked like Barrera hurt Pac a couple of times,but didnt have the strength to TRY take him outLast edited by bishop2006; 10-07-2007, 09:25 AM.Comment
-
Mayweather's resume is better since Pac really only beat an aging Morales and Barrera. Plus you're wrong. p4p is about who'd come out on top if everyone was at the same weight. Basically, if Pac was a bit bigger and fought Floyd at 140,would he win, based on his skill and performances? Of course not, Floyd would pick him apart and very likely tko him.. Plus, Pac ****** last night, DLH/Mayweather was more entertaining than last night..Comment
-
Comment
Comment