Where is Boxing’s Version of Rampage-Henderson?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46539
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Where is Boxing’s Version of Rampage-Henderson?

    By Cliff Rold - There’s a great fight this Saturday, one sure to garner mainstream press and millions of eyes. It doesn’t cost fifty dollars. It doesn’t even cost the premium channel ten or so per month. This one is free as long as you’re one of the just-about-everyone who has basic cable.

    Too bad for boxing; this fight isn’t one of ours.

    In the latest move that hails the winner-take/all-American competition that has erupted between the worlds of professional boxing and mixed martial arts, the UFC is giving away one of the two or three best money matches in its sport this Saturday on Spike TV. In boxing terms, this is Manny Pacquaio-Marco Antonio Barerra II going live on ESPN. In business terms, this is the UFC making a move to overwhelm its elder cousin.

    If the bout between UFC light heavyweight champion Rampage Jackson and Pride middleweight and light heavyweight champ Dan Henderson is a solid fight (unlike the flub that was Jackson-Chuck Liddell), they’ll be a hell of a big step closer.

    In some ways, 2007 has been a year of great rebound for boxing. It’s delivering a stream of red hot fights at a time when anything less would be both dangerous and foolish. Such is the beauty of competition. Unfortunately, no matter how many great fights are made, audience size is a huge component in any sports popularity and Jackson-Henderson can deliver an audience no major fight has seen in years.

    Call it the benefit of a business model. UFC has one. Boxing does not. UFC is 21st century sports marketing and savvy; boxing is pre-Keynesian laissez faire capitalism in a world without room for it. It’s a series of independent contracts going to the highest bidder, regardless of whether or not the end result of all those contracts eventually result in lower real bids and less real audience. [details]
  • Allucard
    Undisputed Champion
    • Jun 2007
    • 5979
    • 393
    • 56
    • 12,399

    #2
    Agree 100% Boxing should, alike UFC, be a company, with contracts and all.

    Comment

    • Kball15
      HATTON WRIGHT PAVLIK
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Apr 2006
      • 15471
      • 491
      • 86
      • 22,680

      #3
      Originally posted by Allucard
      Agree 100% Boxing should, alike UFC, be a company, with contracts and all.
      of coarse this is ture, but is it so much to ask that we get positive articles, instead of negative negative negative? i mean, **** is depressing, all the time

      Comment

      • jai mari078
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jun 2006
        • 2935
        • 82
        • 0
        • 9,440

        #4
        I am a die hard boxing fan,and always will be. I neverused to,like MMA until I sat down and actually watched,and I love it. I understand the differences in the two sports, and respect and appreciate the skill that both sides have. I have to admit though, that i feel that MMA does a better job of marketing there product. They have very good fights on a consistant basis and they are exciting. They also do a good job of incresing there fan base and popularity, by doing things like this with such a high profile fight. Evevn when I have paid for a fight in the past, I was ok with it bedcause I always felt I got my moneys worth. There have been many times that i can't say the same for some of the mega fights in boxing, they usually don't live up to the hype after you have paid $50. I am not hating on boxing, but they need to wake up.

        Comment

        • crold1
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Apr 2005
          • 6354
          • 328
          • 122
          • 19,304

          #5
          K: This wasn't negative; it was actually quite the opposite with lots of attention paid to what boxing is doing right but also the point that it doesn't have the audience the quality deserves. I'm a boxing cheerleader.

          Comment

          • Kball15
            HATTON WRIGHT PAVLIK
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Apr 2006
            • 15471
            • 491
            • 86
            • 22,680

            #6
            Originally posted by crold1
            K: This wasn't negative; it was actually quite the opposite with lots of attention paid to what boxing is doing right but also the point that it doesn't have the audience the quality deserves. I'm a boxing cheerleader.
            yea but its playing on the fact that if boxing does this or that its gonna die and i hate that.

            Anyway, UFC promotes there sport Tremedously, and Boxing seems to be at least trying to follow in its footsteps, and results should be very very good.

            Comment

            • -Antonio-
              -Antonio-
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jun 2005
              • 24259
              • 629
              • 163
              • 38,153

              #7
              I had no idea this was on Spike. This is a great marketing strategy by the UFC. Theres a reason they are becoming so popular.

              Comment

              • bishop2006
                Pound For Pound
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jan 2006
                • 5301
                • 175
                • 0
                • 12,214

                #8
                I didnt read it all,yeh,Rampage-Henderson is free on TV,so is Taylor-Pavlik,the biggest middleweight fight in years

                Comment

                • zxcvbnmasdf
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Sep 2007
                  • 227
                  • 48
                  • 1
                  • 6,364

                  #9
                  No. Taylor - Pavlik is on HBO.
                  I dont get why people call HBO "free tv".
                  It's a pay channel.
                  EVERYONE has Spike TV.
                  Compared to the amount of people with cable, barely anyone has HBO.

                  This isn't a negative article either.
                  It just shows how much more brilliant UFC is at marketing and promoting its events.

                  Comment

                  • ajc1984
                    Amateur
                    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                    • Dec 2006
                    • 15
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    • 6,047

                    #10
                    It's free because it's not being shown live - it's on a 6 hour tape delay.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP