morales/diaz revisited

[HendrixLove]

they said that in when he was fighting Paulie, they said that when he was fighting Hamed they said that when he was fight Morales the 3rd time.

Who gives a ****, Barrera is going to get beat down worse than he did the first time. I'll bet all my ****en points on it with you if you're not a little *****.

[JakeNDaBox]

they said that in when he was fighting Paulie, they said that when he was fighting Hamed they said that when he was fight Morales the 3rd time.

they didn't say it the first time he fought Pacquiao. They didn't say it the first time he fought Junior Jones.

Maybe people shouldn't say it this time around, and instead just let it happen.

I'm indifferent to both fighters, but wouldn't be terribly upset if Pac repeated the first fight, only this time beating Marco into retirement - or perhaps Marco and Erik fighting one last time, this time in Mexico with nothing more at stake than bragging rights, and the winner getting to retire with a win.

[eazy_mas]

Who gives a ****, Barrera is going to get beat down worse than he did the first time. I'll bet all my ****en points on it with you if you're not a little *****.

well i never bet with anyone in this site. never did and never going to do. But I never couted Barrera out

they didn't say it the first time he fought Pacquiao. They didn't say it the first time he fought Junior Jones.

Maybe people shouldn't say it this time around, and instead just let it happen.

I'm indifferent to both fighters, but wouldn't be terribly upset if Pac repeated the first fight, only this time beating Marco into retirement - or perhaps Marco and Erik fighting one last time, this time in Mexico with nothing more at stake than bragging rights, and the winner getting to retire with a win.

well a fighter is not how many time he falls down but how many time he pick himself up and win, and Barrera was doing it through his career it pretty hard to comeback from a beating

[damian5000]

honestly eazy, you are a MAB nuthugger.....always discrediting Morlaes and Marquez...

and for that guy that said diaz's numbers were almost as good but with more punches thrown and stuff, post the numbers before the 7th round because Morales counldnt fight from that round on.... so it was obvious diaz would get better numbers, fact is Morlaes won 8 rounds and fights are scored in rounds...

But I guess you forgot that the Associated Press, ESPN, and all 3 judges had the fight for Diaz. So it's impossible that Morales won 8 rounds. Or maybe you're better equipped to judge than that group.

[DiegoFuego]

I had it 115-112 Morales

Close but clear for me. I can't believe Morales didn't protest more

[eazy_mas]

I had it 115-112 Morales

Close but clear for me. I can't believe Morales didn't protest more

maybe because he felt that he lose it was a close fight and he could discourage Diaz to stop even with his clean punchs

[ben41193]

I had it a draw myself

[Sttuddahboy619]

At least your honest about it. The scoring was all wrong for that fight, they gave Diaz a 10-8 in round 2 for the slip, which was ruled a slip by the ref. WTF? They also only gave Morales a 10-9 for the knock down in the 1st as well. I think it was hometown gift. Morales was the better boxer that night. Diaz fought an ugly fight.

Holy ****.I didn't know that they scored a 10-9 for Morales in the 1st rd.

[brently1979]

Holy ****.I didn't know that they scored a 10-9 for Morales in the 1st rd.

The Worst was a 10-8 in the 2nd for Diaz.

[-Hyperion-]

But I guess you forgot that the Associated Press, ESPN, and all 3 judges had the fight for Diaz. So it's impossible that Morales won 8 rounds. Or maybe you're better equipped to judge than that group.

if they gave that fight to diaz, then yeah, im better at judging fights....