Allow me to explain the topic to you, because what you think that you created a topic about...isnt what you actually did create a topic about.
You are asking what Hatton brings to the table that other fighters who Floyd beat couldnt. However, because you are a ****, you deliberately phrased a very inflammatory thread title of "Is Hatton the easiest fight Mayweather has had in years?".
Now, I'd hate to second guess, but I'd imagine that the reason for doing this, is to try and get some digs in about Hatton whilst trying to pretend that you're actually after a serious discussion.
Me, I'm not buying it, as such I will discuss with you on the subject of your thread title. The nature of that discussion being that you yourself know that Hatton isnt the easiest fight of the past few years, because you deliberately didnt mention Gatti...who is OBVIOUSLY (and who you obviously recognise as being) a MUCH better candidate for that title (hence you neglecting to mention him). As such, you're being a ****, futhrermore you KNOW that you're being a **** and I will, therefore, treat you like a ****.
You are asking what Hatton brings to the table that other fighters who Floyd beat couldnt. However, because you are a ****, you deliberately phrased a very inflammatory thread title of "Is Hatton the easiest fight Mayweather has had in years?".
Now, I'd hate to second guess, but I'd imagine that the reason for doing this, is to try and get some digs in about Hatton whilst trying to pretend that you're actually after a serious discussion.
Me, I'm not buying it, as such I will discuss with you on the subject of your thread title. The nature of that discussion being that you yourself know that Hatton isnt the easiest fight of the past few years, because you deliberately didnt mention Gatti...who is OBVIOUSLY (and who you obviously recognise as being) a MUCH better candidate for that title (hence you neglecting to mention him). As such, you're being a ****, futhrermore you KNOW that you're being a **** and I will, therefore, treat you like a ****.
Comment