It means both guys are unproven so picking either way isn't embarrassing. Calzaghe gets a little more respect having dominated Lacy, but he remains an unproven fighter. Great ability, incredible workrate when he's motivated, but unproven against real competition. I think it goes to a decision, but I haven't decided which way. Obviously, we're all too uninformed to make an expert analysis unless you think one guy looked better destroying his nobodies.
Official - Hatton v Mayweather! who you got???
Collapse
-
-
when was the last time pbf knocked anyone out plus hatton will still keep goin at himComment
-
Comment
-
And yet your 'informed' opinion from the Calzaghe vs Lacy fight was that the green and untested Lacy was going to utterly destroy Calzaghe. Right?
It seems to me like you've learned your lesson, but not quite enough. That one must've burned you real bad, huh?Comment
-
Your wasting your time...
Some people never learn..
He saying Hatton has no chance..just like he said Lacy would wipe the floor with Calzaghe in 7 rounds..
Laugh my ass off...
I'd be embarrassed and keep my head down abit..
This guy knows no shame...
Comment
-
Mayweather in Decision...easy....no one is gonna be able to beat him from Britian.....I think the winner of Cotto-Mosley would have the best chance to beat PBF...Comment
Comment