Official - Hatton v Mayweather! who you got???

[msagrain]

you lost all credibility saying lacy would KO calzaghe in round 7 LMAO

i knew joe c would beat lacy when all you americans said he wouldnt n ill stick will hatton over mayweather and all the other brishish fighters that the americans have thought that would beat the british and the uk fighters won

[DiegoFuego]

What a redundant post. Can you not want something to happen knowing that its not the most likely outcome? Do I have to be like you and say "Oh, its Hatton 100%, going to knock him out and murder him and PBF will never fight again" and give no sway in my answer? I want Hatton to win, I hope Hatton will win, I think that he can win, but I know that Mayweather is the more likely victor and so, although I would bet on Hatton to make a bit of money, I wouldnt risk my mortgage on him. There is nothing wrong with hedging your bets mate, that is wise, not ******. The ****** thing is those who are posting that Hatton "CANT" beat PBF and who can only see one side of the fence altogether.

YOU'RE STILL PLAYING BOTH SIDES OF THE FENCE lol! Just pick a winner for Christ's sake!

I'm not saying Hatton can't win. I'm picking Floyd. What the hell are you doing?

[DiegoFuego]

The fact that Calzaghe fans still bring up the Lacy fight is kind of embarrassing. Seriously, the best win on your resume is Jeff Lacy?? That has to be the worst resume of anyone in the top 10 p4p. If Calzaghe even had one loss, he wouldn't be in the top 20.

[msagrain]

The fact that Calzaghe fans still bring up the Lacy fight is kind of embarrassing. Seriously, the best win on your resume is Jeff Lacy?? That has to be the worst resume of anyone in the top 10 p4p. If Calzaghe even had one loss, he wouldn't be in the top 20.

well se what happen after joe c next fightt stick to hatton mayweather fight now

[.Mik.]

And I admit now that Lacy is not a good fighter, so what's the problem? Would you admit Hatton wasn't very good if he lost every round to Mayweather? I don't think you would.

Well thats the whole point isnt it?

I guess that it just comes down to which you think is the most ******. Someone who says:

"I think that Lacy is good, but he's untested. I think that Calzaghe will win because he's been more tested. But Lacy has more power and is stronger so I think that he has a chance" and then when Calzaghe wins, you say "Calzaghe outfought Lacy. He was technically excellent and took advantage of the green-flaws in Lacy's game"

Or the person who says:

"Lacy is going to spark Calzaghe out. 7 rounds and Calzaghe will be completely exposed and will never fight again. Calzaghe is nothing and Lacy is the next big thing" and then when Calzaghe wins, you say "Lacy was rubbish, he is not a good fighter. The win meant nothing for Calzaghe because Lacy is crap".


Me, I think that the second person is ******er and I also think that you are ******. Be tunnel vision all you want. I picked Hatton because I want him to win, I dont need better reasons than that and I also dont need to make up some lies about how I think that Hatton is going to pound Mayweather into the ground and 'expose' him, just to justify my choice.

[rambov]

Easy. hatton hits and then hugs. Its a habit. When he throws that looping right and then brings his head down while running in to hold..here comes Floyd with an uppercut...snapping Hatton's jaw thereby knocking Hatton the **** out.

[DiegoFuego]

The Lacy fight was a lose-lose situation for Calzaghe going in, but the fact that he dominated him so thoroughly increased his stock and brought him more recognition in the sport. Refusing to fight anyone his entire career until now is what has put Calzaghe in this lose-lose situation, which will remain so until he fights elite, accomplished fighters like Hopkins, Wright, or Taylor. Even a win over Kessler isn't going to help him much because Kessler isn't in a much better position than Lacy was. Hopkins waited until the end of his career to fight the big names, but look at him now. Trinidad, DLH, Taylor twice, Tarver, and Wright. He's taking advantage of the spotlight, which Calzaghe is only beginning to do. You can't be protected your entire career because when retirement rolls around and you haven't done ****, you aren't going to be remembered. If Calzaghe beats Kessler, he has got to keep that **** rolling for another 2-3 years against real competition (not saying Kessler isn't, but he's largely unproven).

[DiegoFuego]

By the way, Hatton's competition destroys Calzaghe's and Kessler's, and most people would agree that Hatton has a weak resume aside from being undefeated.

[.Mik.]

The Lacy fight was a lose-lose situation for Calzaghe going in, but the fact that he dominated him so thoroughly increased his stock and brought him more recognition in the sport. Refusing to fight anyone his entire career until now is what has put Calzaghe in this lose-lose situation, which will remain so until he fights elite, accomplished fighters like Hopkins, Wright, or Taylor. Even a win over Kessler isn't going to help him much because Kessler isn't in a much better position than Lacy was. Hopkins waited until the end of his career to fight the big names, but look at him now. Trinidad, DLH, Taylor twice, Tarver, and Wright. He's taking advantage of the spotlight, which Calzaghe is only beginning to do. You can't be protected your entire career because when retirement rolls around and you haven't done ****, you aren't going to be remembered. If Calzaghe beats Kessler, he has got to keep that **** rolling for another 2-3 years against real competition (not saying Kessler isn't, but he's largely unproven).

Thats some better bet-hedging for the Calzaghe vs Kessler fight. You're learning.

If you think that Kessler is much the same as Lacy...doesnt this mean that you think that Kessler will knock out Calzaghe within 7 rounds?

[mick66]

I voted Hatton, more because I want him to win.....
It concerns me that Hatton is fighting at 147...Hope they learnt their lession from Collazo...

Hope Billy Graham can pull another tactical gem out the hat..