Mayweathers Next Fight

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SpeedKillz
    PHILLY'S FINEST
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2007
    • 6367
    • 256
    • 160
    • 13,276

    #31
    Originally posted by pbftxrs316
    actually, i saw thr fight 8-4 with oscar winning rounds 2, 6, 7, and 8, and that round was iffy, it could have went either way. even inround 4 when oscar got off that flurry of bodyshots while he held floyd's other hand, floyd just landed the more effective, cleaner shots. the rounds that floyd did lose he landed more than oscar still, or a punch or two less than him. oscar lost the fight by unanimous decision imo and the scorecards were shake, especially by kazmerrick. kellerman said it best.

    as far as oscar being past his prime, well, it's easy for you to claim this when the fight is over, but i'm not certain, but am willing to bet that you, just like many other people on this forum had high hopes in oscar beating floyd, especially with the left hook. then you realized that floyd was world's apart from oscar because floyd won this fight just cruising. he fought at a remotely steady tempo and whether oscar pressed the fight, which he did, or not, overall, he fought at floyd's pace. oscar threw a lot of flurries but missed many punches, if not, most. seeing how floyd had a higher landed punch percentile than oscar did, and watching how floyd landed his punches, he showed me once again just how versaitle he is.

    okay, in round 2 when oscar threw his jab, he started to look more into the fight. he was more aggressive, more relentless, and he landed some pretty decent shots, but mayweather kept his poise and he also landed some pretty decent shots, but at a low tempo. he manuvered his body to where he blocked many of oscar's shots and still seemed to land the more effective shots. oscar actually landed less punches than floyd in that round, but at a higher punch output and more active pressure, i could see why that round went to him. floyd, comes back in round 3, still fighting calm, justlanding potshots here and there, was slowly showing oscar that he could be as aggressive as he wanted to, throw as much as he wanted to, press the fight as much as he wanted and felt he needed to, but as long as floyd dictates his pace, oscar wasn't really doing anything. so when it looked like floyd was being just defensive, he'd land a power shot that oscar would try to to walk through to land something himself, which he did some effectiviely, but in turn, floyd stepped up the pace with his great foot movement. and then he showcased his great defense like his blocking, something that his father fail to mention in his interview with larry merchant, but i'll touch on that in a bit.

    in round 4, oscar landed some decent shots especially to the body but floyd methodically was hitting oscar which the guys who tallied up the landed punches saw. oscar lost that round imo was as active as he was, he missed a lot of punches. he threw more, which many of mayweather's opponent's do, but floyd was more accurate because he picks his punches wisely, just like in round 5 where he hit oscar with a vicious left hook, followed by a jab to the body that set up a right hook upstairs. oscar tried to stay active but he was missing too many punches and then when he got floyd on the ropes, seeing just how brilliant floyd maweather is with his eye movement and counterpunching ability as well as his timing, oscar threw a right and a left and the right was blocked and floyd countered oscar with a right hook as oscar was coming back with the left hook and he did this twice. the rounds that floyd won, like round 5, 10, and 11, he dominated those rounds. the rounds that oscar won, he didn't dominate those rounds, he was just more active. he stopped using his jab, the punch that he landed effectively in round 8, and in turn lost that round to some people like lederman, but i actually gave oscar that round, but it could have goine either way. my point is, oscar wasn't past his prime imo in the sense that he couldn't go(because he's always had stamina issues), and seeing how floyd wasn't in his prime imo either but not past it, i make the argument that you have 2 fighters past their primes but still great fighters. floyd mayweather's prime weight imo was 140, not 154. oscar's prime weight may have been 147, but a 140 pound mayweather would have ripped apart a 147 pound de la hoya. why? floyd has always been faster, better defensive, better foot movement, better stamina, better endurance, more dominate, a better counterpuncher, a quicker jab and left hook, a better right hand, better upperbody movement, better timing, higher accuracy, better polished, and could use the ring much better than de la hoya could in any point of oscar's career. oscar was a warrior with great boxing skills and a great left hook and a stiff jab. mayweather is leauges ahead of oscar. his skills are second to none, and oscar, as great as he is, doesn't and has never held a candle to floyd mayweather's skills. his resume is bigger and better imo, but his skills are nowhere near floyd's and they never will be.

    as far as floyd sr is concerned. maybe he needs to go back and rewatch just whatt he said. and maybe you need to also. he claimed that if you score off of just punch stats, oscar won. yes, oscar threw more punches, but landed 85 punches less, in just the power punch stat. he landed less in the jab punch stat because he threw less jabs than floyd did and floyd landed more jabs than oscar did. when oscar threw his jab it landed well, but that's when he consistently threw it in the 8th round. many of oscar's punches missed floyd, because of how great a blocker floyd is. floyd sr failed to mention this in his interview. i guess he thought that if he said what he said, he'd get in good with oscar. too bad for him, oscar is keeping freddie roach. tough **** floyd sr. people though oscar won because he threw more punches that floyd and was more active. well, if that's how boxing is scored,then winky wright would have a much worst recored than he does, because how is it okay when he blocks punches, and the punchers look more active than him, but only land punches on his arms and shoulders, but when floyd jr does that, he loses. i mean, this isn't the first time this has happened in a floyd jr fight. he has thrown less punches than many to most of his opponents but landed more and was less active that those opponents. yet, nobody complains until he fights de la hoya. i call this the hippocracy of our deboxcracy.
    2 for 2 in the awesome posts department. keep at it

    Comment

    • pbftxrs316
      Ellerbe's bum cleaner
      • Aug 2006
      • 4102
      • 201
      • 0
      • 10,761

      #32
      Originally posted by Tha_Greatest
      I do give you alot of credit for a decent argument until you put up a biased guarantee, how are you going to make a guarantee, thats only a belief or opinion that you have about nobody can beat Floyd, Many people do remember the first castillo fight, Many people thought Castillo won. Their is no such thing as a guarantee from pbftxrs316 for Floyd to win. Floyd may be the favorite against everyone on paper but its not guaranteed for him to win just cause hes a betting favorite,
      take it easy cowboy, i always guarantee a floyd victory over a fighter who i believe will lose to him. you call it what you want, but i call it believing in your fighter. i know it's only belief or my opinion but i have a strong belief in floyd mayweather and i don't see anything biased about it. yes, he is my all time favorite fighter. i've made no secrets about this, but i've always gave logical explanations and reasoning behind why i make these so called "biased guarantees". this is why i make claims the way i do because i know the game and i was apart of the game and i love boxing and i watch every fighter. i'm only 20 years old but i've been around boxing majority of my life and i fought in the ring for 8 years myself. when i tell you, that i know boxing, i really do know the sport. my claims for mayweather will stay the same until i am proven wrong.

      now, i appreciate you giving me credit for a decent argument, but you could at least counter argue me with reasoning as to why you disagree with me with examples or something. get back to me.
      Last edited by pbftxrs316; 07-19-2007, 04:35 PM.

      Comment

      • UltimateBoxer69
        Amateur
        Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
        • Jun 2007
        • 29
        • 2
        • 0
        • 6,112

        #33
        Originally posted by Tha_Greatest
        How is he #1 p4p if he barely beat a old Oscar out of prime Oscar in a split decision where many believed Oscar won, Even Flods dad thought Oscar won so that said , he should fight Mosley or Hatton
        After reading that comment....well i really do feel sorry for Mayweather...Literally. He beats Oscar on HIS terms...and people turn round and say yeah yeah he's old and past his prime. Here is a list of excuses people will be saying about Mayweather if he wins bouts against :

        Mosley - Past his prime
        Cotto - Not ready for the elite WW yet...still learning his trade
        Hatton - Not enough nig names on his CV and we all knew that he has a poor defense
        Williams - Still to young and virtually non- existent defense...it was obvious he would get whooped by Floyd
        Margarito - well he was exposed by Williams and just another Bob Arum product of hype.

        To me Floyd is in a really bad position here where he will get slagged of by people on his every move. Give the guy some credit here...He beat De La Hoya on HIS terms...How that judge gave oscar victory (115-113) is beyond me...he must have been watching another fight! Cut the guy some slack and give some credit where it is due!

        Comment

        • ThaHorseman
          Undisputed Champion
          • Sep 2006
          • 1472
          • 141
          • 19
          • 7,875

          #34
          Originally posted by UltimateBoxer69
          After reading that comment....well i really do feel sorry for Mayweather...Literally. He beats Oscar on HIS terms...and people turn round and say yeah yeah he's old and past his prime. Here is a list of excuses people will be saying about Mayweather if he wins bouts against :

          Mosley - Past his prime
          Cotto - Not ready for the elite WW yet...still learning his trade
          Hatton - Not enough nig names on his CV and we all knew that he has a poor defense
          Williams - Still to young and virtually non- existent defense...it was obvious he would get whooped by Floyd
          Margarito - well he was exposed by Williams and just another Bob Arum product of hype.

          To me Floyd is in a really bad position here where he will get slagged of by people on his every move. Give the guy some credit here...He beat De La Hoya on HIS terms...How that judge gave oscar victory (115-113) is beyond me...he must have been watching another fight! Cut the guy some slack and give some credit where it is due!
          Very well said. It doesn't matter who he fights because there will be an excuse for why he beat any of those guys.

          I wonder who is the flavor to the week. Everyone decided Mosley would beat him after Shane called Floyd out. People chose Hatton as the one to give Floyd his first "L" after the Castillo fight. The last week has been about how bad Williams and Cintron would whoop on Floyd. Cotto had his two weeks after the Judah fight as being Floyd's conqueror.

          IMO, Cotto would give Floyd the toughest fight, but Hatton is the most logical opponents based on Legacy, Money, and fan approval.

          Comment

          • SpeedKillz
            PHILLY'S FINEST
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • May 2007
            • 6367
            • 256
            • 160
            • 13,276

            #35
            Originally posted by UltimateBoxer69
            After reading that comment....well i really do feel sorry for Mayweather...Literally. He beats Oscar on HIS terms...and people turn round and say yeah yeah he's old and past his prime. Here is a list of excuses people will be saying about Mayweather if he wins bouts against :

            Mosley - Past his prime
            Cotto - Not ready for the elite WW yet...still learning his trade
            Hatton - Not enough nig names on his CV and we all knew that he has a poor defense
            Williams - Still to young and virtually non- existent defense...it was obvious he would get whooped by Floyd
            Margarito - well he was exposed by Williams and just another Bob Arum product of hype.

            To me Floyd is in a really bad position here where he will get slagged of by people on his every move. Give the guy some credit here...He beat De La Hoya on HIS terms...How that judge gave oscar victory (115-113) is beyond me...he must have been watching another fight! Cut the guy some slack and give some credit where it is due!

            it seems like people look at all the top ten welterweights and have a notebook full of excuses for each one if floyd decides to fight one of them, so its a never-ending circle of ingornace. i preached the same things u do over and over and over and new excuses jus keep boiling up. it wont end. floyd could fight them all in one night and they would still have excuses...

            Comment

            • SpeedKillz
              PHILLY'S FINEST
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • May 2007
              • 6367
              • 256
              • 160
              • 13,276

              #36
              Originally posted by ThaHorseman
              Very well said. It doesn't matter who he fights because there will be an excuse for why he beat any of those guys.

              I wonder who is the flavor to the week. Everyone decided Mosley would beat him after Shane called Floyd out. People chose Hatton as the one to give Floyd his first "L" after the Castillo fight. The last week has been about how bad Williams and Cintron would whoop on Floyd. Cotto had his two weeks after the Judah fight as being Floyd's conqueror.

              IMO, Cotto would give Floyd the toughest fight, but Hatton is the most logical opponents based on Legacy, Money, and fan approval.
              concurs!!!

              Comment

              • Tha_Greatest
                YOU HATE FLOYD TOO
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Mar 2005
                • 12705
                • 699
                • 1,160
                • 22,620

                #37
                Originally posted by pbftxrs316
                take it easy cowboy, i always guarantee a floyd victory over a fighter who i believe will lose to him. you call it what you want, but i call it believing in your fighter. i know it's only belief or my opinion but i have a strong belief in floyd mayweather and i don't see anything biased about it. yes, he is my all time favorite fighter. i've made no secrets about this, but i've always gave logical explanations and reasoning behind why i make these so called "biased guarantees". this is why i make claims the way i do because i know the game and i was apart of the game and i love boxing and i watch every fighter. i'm only 20 years old but i've been around boxing majority of my life and i fought in the ring for 8 years myself. when i tell you, that i know boxing, i really do know the sport. my claims for mayweather will stay the same until i am proven wrong.

                now, i appreciate you giving me credit for a decent argument, but you could at least counter argue me with reasoning as to why you disagree with me with examples or something. get back to me.
                Thank Jesus for you, you are the first rational Floyd fan ever, props for your rationalizing the guarantee, I do like to talk bad about Floyd to see what irrational Floyd fans will say but you are the first reasonable Floyd fan that talks with using your brain, not your heart but your brain, thank you man, props and big ups


                By the way, the poll i did on my best trainer thread is meant to piss of superoverbiased Floyd trains and to see what they will tell me about Floyd Jr, Sorry, for what i wrote on one poll about Floyd(It has nothing to do with The best trainer, it is meant to piss off irrational Floyd fans,

                Thanks again for smart posting
                Last edited by Tha_Greatest; 07-19-2007, 05:18 PM.

                Comment

                • ThaHorseman
                  Undisputed Champion
                  • Sep 2006
                  • 1472
                  • 141
                  • 19
                  • 7,875

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Tha_Greatest
                  Thank Jesus for you, you are the first rational Floyd fan ever, props for your rationalizing the guarantee, I do like to talk bad about Floyd to see what irrational Floyd fans will say but you are the first reasonable Floyd fan that talks with using your brain, not your heart but your brain, thank you man, props and big ups


                  By the way, the poll i did on my best trainer thread is meant to piss of superoverbiased Floyd trains and to see what they will tell me about Floyd Jr, Sorry, for what i wrote on one poll about Floyd(It has nothing to do with The best trainer, it is meant to piss off irrational Floyd fans,

                  Thanks again for smart posting
                  Wow, You go on and on about Floyd fans being irrational yet you waste space on this forum by posting immature polls to "see what they'll tell you"?You have way too much time on your hands.

                  Comment

                  • Tha_Greatest
                    YOU HATE FLOYD TOO
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Mar 2005
                    • 12705
                    • 699
                    • 1,160
                    • 22,620

                    #39
                    Originally posted by ThaHorseman
                    Wow, You go on and on about Floyd fans being irrational yet you waste space on this forum by posting immature polls to "see what they'll tell you"?You have way too much time on your hands.
                    I have to kill time today cause i got suspended from work for 2 days for showing up late. I love to see my immature comments be answered by irrational Floyd fans, especially the comments where i get blasted for having too much time in my hands yet theyre on the net doing the same thing as i am, which is posting, just like you, today we both have alot of time in our hands

                    Comment

                    • ianblake
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jul 2007
                      • 3677
                      • 935
                      • 626
                      • 10,263

                      #40
                      To me Floyd is in a really bad position here where he will get slagged of by people on his every move. Give the guy some credit here...He beat De La Hoya on HIS terms...How that judge gave oscar victory (115-113) is beyond me...he must have been watching another fight! Cut the guy some slack and give some credit where it is due!

                      +1

                      i have the fight 115-113 Floyd he clearly beat Oscar

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP