How would Wladimir Klitschko do against past heavyweights?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mishra100
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jul 2005
    • 1330
    • 142
    • 63
    • 7,690

    #41
    Originally posted by YNWA
    probably, but bar ernie shavers there was noone around at that time who could hit as hard back as wlad. foreman probably wins, but wlads got a half decent chance. think wlad would have success with the jab, just have to avoid the power shots

    aww you stole my

    "Who would win, Wlad or Ernie Shavers?" post :-p

    Comment

    • Brother Blues
      RECTUM___MASSEUSE
      • Jan 2007
      • 979
      • 189
      • 0
      • 7,116

      #42
      Shavers...he took a better punch and gave a harder one.

      Comment

      • GranTorino
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Aug 2004
        • 1893
        • 121
        • 103
        • 8,462

        #43
        Originally posted by Brother Blues
        Nothing like being a fan...short for fantastic,you can believe anything.


        Actually, fan is short for fanatic..which could actually explain a few things. lol

        Comment

        • Thunder Lips
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Jan 2007
          • 434
          • 26
          • 1
          • 6,539

          #44
          Oh what the hell...

          I don't think poor Frazier and Norton would have a chance in hell against Wlad. It would most likely be a methodical massacre, not as abrupt as the Foreman matches but just as brutal. They were great fighters that gave post-comeback Ali hell, but they wouldn't be able to get around/walk through Wlad's jab nor would they be able to find him with their own punches. Boxing is always about match ups. Foreman would fare better if he could land anything as he could be slow and sloppy in those days, and would probably have trouble with Wlad's size and skill. I don't think Wlad could hit prime Ali, and would probably lose a lopsided decision. Prime Holyfield would be a tough fight for Wlad with his speedy counter punching and strong punch. ****ing Bowe wouldn't even fight Wlad, he'd dodge him like he dodged Lewis. The Tyson match up would be the most interesting, it would probably go like the Tucker fight though Wlad packs a harder punch and is way bigger than Tucker; Wlad could pull that one out I think though Tyson could tear his body up.

          Comment

          • Brother Blues
            RECTUM___MASSEUSE
            • Jan 2007
            • 979
            • 189
            • 0
            • 7,116

            #45
            Wald is very skilled,I'll state the obvious...but it's that chin,which is why I believe Foreman knocks him out.Ali slices him up...Frazier?...I don't know...good fight,but if he lands that left hook,lights out.

            The chin is also why I would do not think he would fare well against many of the greats.The second teir guys,yeah he beats.

            The young Tyson...lights out.Holyfeild,late KO by Holy...
            Larry Holmes,Wald gets sliced and diced...

            Just my opinion....

            Comment

            • amagnin
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jul 2006
              • 1454
              • 30
              • 13
              • 7,733

              #46
              It is my opinion that it is difficult and unfair to compare different boxers from different eras especially in the HW division. If you look at it historically the champs were MUCH smaller than today's champ and as a result I think that many of today's champs would fare quite well against many past HW champs. That being said although I think that Wlad is probably a favorite against most past HW greats (if they fought 10 times I give Wlad a good chance to win at least 6 against most) I by no means consider him to be one of or the GREATEST. It all is dependent on the era while head 2 head Wlad would often prevail guys like Marciano, Dempsey, Ali, Foreman etc. they never lost to the likes of Ross Puritty. So I guess my answer is Wlad would fare well but I'm not sure what the historical significance of that is.

              Comment

              • wmute
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Nov 2003
                • 8083
                • 289
                • 446
                • 15,158

                #47
                Originally posted by GranTorino
                Wlad would beat any heavy in history in their prime. Period.
                like Corrie Sanders? or like Ross Purrity? or maybe he could go 1-1 (like he di against the great Lamon Brewster)?

                Comment

                • wmute
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Nov 2003
                  • 8083
                  • 289
                  • 446
                  • 15,158

                  #48
                  take the all the lineal champions you can think of

                  how many of them have THREE stoppage losses in their youth?

                  NONE

                  Comment

                  • beez721
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Aug 2005
                    • 9637
                    • 252
                    • 55
                    • 16,400

                    #49
                    Originally posted by wmute
                    like Corrie Sanders? or like Ross Purrity? or maybe he could go 1-1 (like he di against the great Lamon Brewster)?
                    lol,,,I love how all the haters can only focus on wlads whopping 3 stoppage losses over 52 fights. he was young and didnt pace himself. 2 of those 3 losses were obvious flukes. the wlad of 2007 is a whole different beast. deal with it

                    Comment

                    • wmute
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Nov 2003
                      • 8083
                      • 289
                      • 446
                      • 15,158

                      #50
                      Originally posted by beez721
                      lol,,,I love how all the haters can only focus on wlads whopping 3 stoppage losses over 52 fights. he was young and didnt pace himself. 2 of those 3 losses were obvious flukes. the wlad of 2007 is a whole different beast. deal with it
                      "deal with it"

                      maybe if someone has to deal with something, it's the fanboys that should deal with their boy being stopped THREE times.

                      How come that no lineal heavyeight champ got KOed three times in their 20s?

                      It must be a coincidence, right? and i have to deal with it, right?

                      pathetic

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP