How would Wladimir Klitschko do against past heavyweights?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • duffgun
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jan 2006
    • 3354
    • 92
    • 0
    • 4,273

    #21
    dont forget that louis beat the 2nd biggest ever heavy weight king Carnera i know he wasn't very good but he is bigger than wlad plus louis beat a few other 220lb+ heavyweights.

    Comment

    • mdoe
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Jan 2007
      • 197
      • 4
      • 4
      • 6,755

      #22
      God would I like to see a prime Foreman knock Wlad's head off lmao, this isn't me hating on Wlad I actually like him, but they would have to cart him off if Foreman connected like he did on Ali or Frazier.

      Comment

      • beez721
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Aug 2005
        • 9637
        • 252
        • 55
        • 16,400

        #23
        Originally posted by duffgun
        dont forget that louis beat the 2nd biggest ever heavy weight king Carnera i know he wasn't very good but he is bigger than wlad plus louis beat a few other 220lb+ heavyweights.
        carnera,,lol. he makes freaking valuev look agile. louis was great tho. one of my all time favs those short punches he threw. his chin was a little suspect though

        Comment

        • dino
          BOXINGSCENE king
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Dec 2004
          • 4319
          • 401
          • 12
          • 11,146

          #24
          Originally posted by realheavyhands
          ali ,frazier ,foreman ,holmes ,tyson, liston, bowe , lennox,dempsey i think would all beat him...not becuse of of them had better skills some of them are just to tough ... i think wlad has alot of trouble with guys faster then him or bigger then him

          you are ignorant ****** gulliable and naive if you think jack dempsey could beat wlad klitchko, wlad would probably kill dempsey in the ring, especially if those used those gloves of his day. that was primitive boxing *******


          ali dosent have the power, frazier would be a punching bag like foreman did him, foreman has a change, holmes dosent have the power, tyson fight could go either way, listen is too slow, bowe was too easy to hit and would get KO'd...lennox lewis beats him

          not only you but most of the people on these boxing forums are ignorant, they think because somebody is more popular and they fought 40 years ago that they are some sort of superman. i would bet my house that wlad dempsey wouldnt go 4 rounds

          Comment

          • dino
            BOXINGSCENE king
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Dec 2004
            • 4319
            • 401
            • 12
            • 11,146

            #25
            Originally posted by duffgun
            dont forget that louis beat the 2nd biggest ever heavy weight king Carnera i know he wasn't very good but he is bigger than wlad plus louis beat a few other 220lb+ heavyweights.
            did you see that fight? that was primitive boxing you ****ing moron..carnera had no skill and was just big, carnera couldnt even beat joe mesi

            Comment

            • Steelhammer86
              Banned
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Mar 2007
              • 2185
              • 235
              • 305
              • 2,378

              #26
              Foreman at his peak would KO Wlad, Wlad would defeat Ali, Frazier or Holmes. Tyson at 21 would likely knock Wlad out, but Wlad would defeat the post-prison Tyson. Lewis would be a close fight, but I think today's version of Wlad might defeat him.

              It is more difficult to predict how Wlad would do against fighters from before 1960.

              Comment

              • duffgun
                Banned
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jan 2006
                • 3354
                • 92
                • 0
                • 4,273

                #27
                Originally posted by CanadaJoe
                Foreman at his peak would KO Wlad, Wlad would defeat Ali, Frazier or Holmes. Tyson at 21 would likely knock Wlad out, but Wlad would defeat the post-prison Tyson. Lewis would be a close fight, but I think today's version of Wlad might defeat him.

                It is more difficult to predict how Wlad would do against fighters from before 1960.
                wlad would not beat ali frazier or holmes. i think he would beat dempsey

                Comment

                • duffgun
                  Banned
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jan 2006
                  • 3354
                  • 92
                  • 0
                  • 4,273

                  #28
                  Originally posted by dino
                  did you see that fight? that was primitive boxing you ****ing moron..carnera had no skill and was just big, carnera couldnt even beat joe mesi
                  dont call me a ****ing moron your the moron thats sucking wlad ****ing **** i clearly said that carnera was ****, i was just showing that louis had beat a few big guys.

                  Comment

                  • hardhitter18
                    Amateur
                    • Jul 2007
                    • 14
                    • 4
                    • 0
                    • 6,047

                    #29
                    Originally posted by dino
                    you are ignorant ****** gulliable and naive if you think jack dempsey could beat wlad klitchko, wlad would probably kill dempsey in the ring, especially if those used those gloves of his day. that was primitive boxing *******


                    ali dosent have the power, frazier would be a punching bag like foreman did him, foreman has a change, holmes dosent have the power, tyson fight could go either way, listen is too slow, bowe was too easy to hit and would get KO'd...lennox lewis beats him

                    not only you but most of the people on these boxing forums are ignorant, they think because somebody is more popular and they fought 40 years ago that they are some sort of superman. i would bet my house that wlad dempsey wouldnt go 4 rounds
                    Originally posted by dino
                    did you see that fight? that was primitive boxing you ****ing moron..carnera had no skill and was just big, carnera couldnt even beat joe mesi
                    finally, someone who actually knows wtf they're talking about on this site, I think me and dino are the only ones on here with any boxing knowledge at all.

                    as I said earlier, Wlad would beat any past heavyweight, he's too big and strong for Ali, Marciano, Louis, and Dempsey, and KO them all in the 1st round, he can beat any heavyweight, execpt Buttrbean, who's not only the greatest heavyweight, but also the greatest fighter of all time! The point is though, that Wlad is one of the top ten heavyweights of all time, period!
                    Last edited by hardhitter18; 07-13-2007, 11:17 AM.

                    Comment

                    • beez721
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Aug 2005
                      • 9637
                      • 252
                      • 55
                      • 16,400

                      #30
                      Originally posted by duffgun
                      wlad would not beat ali frazier or holmes. i think he would beat dempsey
                      wlad would have knocked out both holmes and frazier. a pure boxer without a big punch doesnt beat wlad. holmes would get owned. frazier just too small

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP