Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Since Tsyzu, Why Has Hatton Only Fought the Worst Titleholders?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    Originally posted by Broffy View Post
    Your a ****ing joke, give it a rest you mug.
    How obsessed are you ? now go and take ya mouth for a ****.
    Don't get mad at me because the best fighter from your country is an overrated club fighter.

    Comment


    • #72
      Originally posted by !! $iN View Post
      Don't get mad at me because the best fighter from your country is an overrated club fighter.
      Hatton isn`t the best fighter from Britain, i would put Calzaghe, Khan, Haye, Macrenelli, Witter and even Woods in front of him.

      If he does not fight Witter, who said he would take only a 30% cut in pay and fights some unknown, then he deserves to be called a bum..

      a club fighter? thats just hyperbole ... being a world champion at 2 weights is not really a club fighter... regardless of his loss to Mayweather.

      Comment


      • #73
        Originally posted by CardioMonster View Post
        Hatton isn`t the best fighter from Britain, i would put Calzaghe, Khan, Haye, Macrenelli, Witter and even Woods in front of him.

        If he does not fight Witter, who said he would take only a 30% cut in pay and fights some unknown, then he deserves to be called a bum..

        a club fighter? thats just hyperbole ... being a world champion at 2 weights is not really a club fighter... regardless of his loss to Mayweather.
        You biased clowns weren't saying that before Mayweather knocked him out.

        Comment


        • #74
          Originally posted by Chipper View Post
          Hatton was just getting his belt back from Urango.

          and really Sin u are absolutely obsessed with bashing hatton at every opportunity
          That's because he used to be on Hatton's nuts. He's a "jumper".

          Comment


          • #75
            Originally posted by !! $iN View Post
            You biased clowns weren't saying that before Mayweather knocked him out.
            tsk tsk i might have to add you to my list along with your alt.

            Some people are incapable of having a normal conversation without trying to insult.

            Whatever floats your boat

            Comment


            • #76
              Originally posted by CardioMonster View Post
              tsk tsk i might have to add you to my list along with your alt.

              Some people are incapable of having a normal conversation without trying to insult.

              Whatever floats your boat
              he does have a point tho. before the Mayweather fight, a huge majority of people would have put Hatton over every other British fighter...other than Calzaghe probebly

              Comment


              • #77
                hatton is a warrior

                Comment


                • #78
                  Originally posted by CardioMonster View Post
                  tsk tsk i might have to add you to my list along with your alt.

                  Some people are incapable of having a normal conversation without trying to insult.

                  Whatever floats your boat
                  I bumped his posts when he was on Hatton's nuts. That's how almost all of the haters are, they mask themselves as fans but they can't fool ****.
                  Cotto's fans, Joe Calzaghe fans, not all of course but many aren't even their fans, just haters.

                  Comment


                  • #79
                    Originally posted by blackirish137 View Post
                    he does have a point tho. before the Mayweather fight, a huge majority of people would have put Hatton over every other British fighter...other than Calzaghe probebly
                    But his point makes no sense. If a fighter loses then you have to re-evaluate their level of ability. That is obvious. Jeff Lacy was purported to be the next big thing, are the people that thought this bias clowns? no, they believed something at a time when there was no evidence to suggest otherwise.

                    Comment


                    • #80
                      Originally posted by CardioMonster View Post
                      But his point makes no sense. If a fighter loses then you have to re-evaluate their level of ability. That is obvious. Jeff Lacy was purported to be the next big thing, are the people that thought this bias clowns? no, they believed something at a time when there was no evidence to suggest otherwise.
                      Yes but you don't go from "He's a top 30 fighter of the decade (and i didn't even look hard) to "worst piece of scum" just because someone loses and call yourself a boxing fan. If you act as that you are either a ****** or an hater imo. Take me i was saying Williams is the **** and will be the future of boxing, i was clearly wrong BUT YOU DON'T SEE ME TRYING TO DRAG WILLIAMS IN THE MUD discrediting his entire career. I still think he is an awsome fighter and will comeback for sure.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP